RESEARCH PAPER
A Port-Hamiltonian Framework for Passive Analysis and Energy-Safe Control of Coupled Motor-Robot-Environment Systems
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Physical, University Chouaib Doukkali, Eljadida, Morocco, Morocco
 
2
Department of Physics, University of Ngaoundere, Cameroon, Cameroon
 
3
Department of Physical, University Chouaib Doukkali, Eljadida, Morocco, Morocco
 
 
Submission date: 2026-02-28
 
 
Final revision date: 2026-06-07
 
 
Acceptance date: 2026-06-10
 
 
Publication date: 2026-09-25
 
 
Corresponding author
BOAZ WADAWA   

Department of Physical, University Chouaib Doukkali, Eljadida, Morocco, Avenue des FAR 10, 24000, al-Jadeedah, Morocco
 
 
Acta Mechanica et Automatica 2026;20(3):738-754
 
HIGHLIGHTS
  • • Proposes an energy-centered control paradigm for safe human-robot collaboration
  • • Ensures passive interaction through bounded torque and energy-aware regulation
  • • Prevents excessive energy injection using an adaptive Energy Tank architecture
  • • Validates safe operation across no-load, partial-load, and full-load scenarios
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
This paper proposes a unified and rigorously structured energy-based control framework for a coupled motor-robot-environment system grounded in the port-Hamiltonian formalism. The approach aims to simultaneously guarantee stability, robustness, and energetic safety in physical human-robot interaction scenarios, particularly in collaborative and humanoid robotics. Unlike conventional methods primarily focused on kinematic or dynamic performance, the proposed strategy explicitly structures power flows and the global energy balance, while embedding ethical considerations related to human supervision and control. The main contribution introduces a two-layer safety architecture: (i) explicit limitation of the power injected by the electric motor, ensuring bounded torque transmission; and (ii) an Energy Tank di-mensioned from the maximum gravitational torque τgmax = mgℓ, derived from the gradient of the potential energy. This dual constraint enforces a strict bound on the total available mechanical energy, preserving passivity, preventing unsafe energy amplification, and guaranteeing that robotic autonomy remains energetically supervised and physically controllable by humans. By exploiting the symplectic struc-ture of the port-Hamiltonian model, the total energy variation is formally linked to power ports and dissipative effects. Simulation results demon-strate enhanced robustness, intrinsic energetic coherence, and ethically-informed control, representing a significant step toward safe, controlla-ble, energy-responsible, and human-conscious robotic architectures.
REFERENCES (22)
1.
Wadawa B. Growing Impacts of Robotization and Artifi cial Intelligence for a Global Need to Act Urgently in the Face of the Risks and Poten-tial Damages that Accompany the Development of Human Societies. J Biomed Res Environ Sci. 2023; 4(11): 1582-1585. https://doi.org/ 10.37871/jbres1833.
 
2.
Qing Ch, Yuan T, Li H, Chen Y, Xuehao Wang, Gao S, Ren H, Zhao X, Wang L. A Data-Driven Method for Predicting and Optimizing Indus-trial Robot Energy Consumption Under Unknown Load Conditions. Ac-tuators. 2024; 13(12): 516.https://doi.org/10.3390/act131....
 
3.
Suarez E, Bockelmann H, Eicker N et al. Energy-aware operation of HPC systems in Germany. Frontiers in High Performance Computing. 2025; 3: 1520207. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv....
 
4.
Bengio Y, Hinton G, Yao A et al. Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress. Science. 2024; 384(6698);842-845.https://doi.org/10.1126/scienc....
 
5.
Hendrycks D. Natural selection favors Ais over humans. arXiv preprint arXiv :2303.16200. 2023.https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv....
 
6.
Bengio Y, Mindermann S, Privitera D et al. International ai safety report. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2501. 17805. 2025.https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv....
 
7.
Tao M. Techman robot targets smart manufacturing market with TÜV professional training for its employees. Robot. Autom. News; 2020.
 
8.
Benzi F, Ferraguti F, Secchi C. Energy tank-based control framework for satisfying the iso/ts 15066 constraint. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2023; 56(2);1288-1293. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv....
 
9.
Kalinowska A, Pilarski PM, Murphey TD. Embodied communication: How robots and people communicate through physical interac-tion. Annual review of control, robotics, and autonomous systems. 2023; 6(1): 205-232. https://doi.org/10.1146/annure....
 
10.
Strubell E, Ganesh A, Mccallum A. Energy and policy considerations for deep learning in NLP. In : Proceedings of the 57th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics. 2019; 3645-3650.https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P1....
 
11.
Li J, Chen Z, Li J et al. Research on rehabilitation robot control based on port-Hamiltonian systems and fatigue dissipation port compensa-tion. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2025;13: 1609548. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.....
 
12.
Can E. Energy-aware adaptive altitude control of UAVs via fuzzy–PSO optimization within a port-Hamiltonian framework under icing and sensor noise. International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences. 2026; 27(3):2552-2568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405....
 
13.
Benzi F, Brunner M, Tognon M et al. Adaptive tank-based control for aerial physical interaction with uncertain dynamic environments using energy-task estimation. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters. 2022; 7(4):9129-9136. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.20....
 
14.
Zhen S, LI Y, Liu X et al. A Lyapunov-based robust control for perma-nent magnet synchronous motor in the modular joint of collaborative ro-bot. Robotica. 2023; 41(5): 1389-1406.https://doi.org/10.1017/S02635....
 
15.
Ding Z, Baghbahari M, Behal A. A passivity-based framework for safe physical human–robot interaction. Robotics. 2023; 12(4): 116.https://doi.org/10.3390/roboti....
 
16.
Rashad R, Bicego D, Zult J et al. Energy aware impedance control of a flying end-effector in the port-Hamiltonian framework. IEEE transac-tions on robotics. 2022; 38(6): 3936-3955.https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.20....
 
17.
Duplák J, Krajňák F, Yeromina M et al. Application of Safety Standards in the Design of Robotic Workplaces. SAR Journal (2619-9955). 2025;8(4).
 
18.
Yuan M, Meng Y, QI X et al. Research on simulation of permanent magnet synchronous motor in full speed range. Plos one. 2025; 20(4): e0320786. https://doi.org/10.1371/journa....
 
19.
Van Der Schaft A. Port-Hamiltonian modeling for control. Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems. 2020; 3(1): 393-416. https://doi.org/10.1146/annure....
 
20.
Le LT. Passivity based on energy tank for Cartesian impedance control of DLR space robots with floating base and elastic joints. Journal of Computer Science and Cybernetics. 2018; 34(1):49-62. https://doi.org/10.15625/1813-....
 
21.
Siciliano B, Sciavicco L, VillanI L et al. Robotics: modelling, planning and control. London: Springer London. 2009. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-1-84628-642-1.
 
22.
Zhong-Ping J, Tao B, Weinan G. Learning-based control: A tutorial and some recent results. Foundations and Trends in Systems and Control. 2020; 8(3):176-284. https://doi.org/10.1561/260000....
 
eISSN:2300-5319
ISSN:1898-4088
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top