RESEARCH PAPER
Dynamics of the Non-Contact Roundness Measurement with Air Gages
1
Poznan University of Technology, Institute of Mechanical Technology, Division of Metrology and Measurement Systems, ul. Piotrowo 3, 60-965 Poznań, Poland
Submission date: 2015-12-11
Acceptance date: 2016-07-22
Online publication date: 2016-08-06
Publication date: 2016-09-01
Acta Mechanica et Automatica 2016;10(3):227-232
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The paper presents the results of investigations on the air gages dynamic characteristics in the measurement of the round profiles of motor cylinders. The principle of the measuring device is explained, and the analysis of the air gages dynamics is described. The results of dynamic calibration enabled to eliminate those configurations of air gages that may not meet the requirements of the measurement they were designed for. After the proper air gages were chosen, the entire system underwent the accuracy test and passed it successfully revealing the method accuracy better than 10% compared to the reference measurement.
REFERENCES (25)
1.
Adamczak S., Janecki D., Stępień K. (2010), Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the accuracy of the V-block method of cylindricity measurements, Precision Engineering, 34, 619–626.
2.
Cellary A., Jermak Cz. J. (2009), Pneumatic Method for Reference Out-Of-Roundness Measurement, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference Metrology in Production Engineering, Poznan – Zerkow, 59–64.
3.
Derezynski J., Jakubowicz M. (2016), Verification tests of the air gauges metrological characteristics, Mechanik, 3, 196–199.
4.
Dmitriev V.N., Chernyshev V.I. (1958), Calculation of the time domain characteristics of the pneumatic flow-through chambers, Avtomatika i telemehanika, 12, 1118–1125 (in Russian).
5.
Figliola R.S., Beasley D.E. (2006), Theory and Design for Mechanical Measurements, 4th ed., John Wiley& Sons Inc., Clemson.
6.
Gao R.D., Tang X., Gordon G., Kazmer D.O. (2014), Online product qualty monitoring through in-process measurement, CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, 63(1), 493–496.
7.
Grandy D., Koshy P., Klocke F. (2009), Pneumatic non-contact roughness assessment of moving surfaces, CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, 58(1), 515–518.
8.
Jermak Cz. J., Rucki M. (2012), Air Gauging: Static and Dynamic Characteristics, IFSA, Barcelona.
9.
Jermak Cz.J., Cellary A., Rucki M. (2010), Novel method of non-contact out-of-roundness measurement with air gauges, Proceedings of the euspen 10th International Conference, Delft, 71–74.
10.
Jun Liu et al. (2012), Design and accuracy analysis of pneumatic gauging for form error of spool valve inner hole, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 23, 26–32.
11.
Menzies I., Koshy P. (2009), In-process detection of surface porosity in machined castings, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 49(6), 530–535.
12.
Milo M.W., Roan M., Harris B. (2015), A new statistical approach to automated quality control in manufacturing processes, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 36, 159–167.
13.
O’Neill P., Sohal A., Teng Ch.W. (2016), Quality management approaches and their impact on firms’ financial performance – An Australian study, International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 381–393.
14.
Pollard J.H. (1977), A Handbook of Numerical and Statistical Techniques, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
15.
Rucki M. (2011), Dynamic properties of the back-pressure air gauges with small measuring chambers, Poznan University of Technology, Poznan (in Polish).
16.
Rucki M., Barisic B. (2009), Response Time of Air Gauges With Different Volumes of the Measuring Chambers, Metrology and Measurement Systems, 16(2), 289–298.
17.
Rucki M., Jermak Cz. J. (2012), Dynamic Properties of Small Chamber Air Gages, Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 134(1), p. 011001 (6 pages).
18.
Shiraishi M., Yamagiwa T., Ito A. (2002), Practical dimensional error control and surface roughness inspection in turning, Proceedings of ASME-2002 Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, New Orleans, 45–51.
19.
Stępień K. (2010), In situ measurement of cylindricity – Problems and solutions, Precision Engineering, 38, 697–701.
20.
Tsidulko F.V. (1965), Dynamics of the pneumatic devices for the dimensional measurement, Mashinostroyeniye, Moskva (in Russian).
21.
Vacharanukul K., Mekid S. (2005), In-Process Dimensional Inspection Sensors, Measurement, 38, 204–218.
22.
Valicek J. et al. (2007), An investigation of surfaces generated by abrasive waterjets using optical detection, Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 53(4), 224–232.
23.
Wang Y. H. et al. (2005), An Automatic Sorting System Based on Pneumatic Measurement, Key Engineering Materials, 295-296, 563–568.
24.
Wieczorkowski S. (1995), Automatic regulation of the rotational speed of the pneumatic misroturbines, Research Publication Series of Lodz University of Technology, No. 703, Lodz (in Polish).
25.
Yribarren R. (1955), The pneumatic method applied to dynamic measurement, Proceedings of the Symposium on Engineering dimensional metrology, London, 225–240.
| eISSN: | 2300-5319 |
| ISSN: | 1898-4088 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
