Bialystok University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Robotics and Mechatronics, ul. Wiejska 45C, 15-351 Białystok, Poland
The paper concerns the inverted pendulum control system with using pneumatic cylinder. A mathematical model of the pendulum used to derive the LQG controller was presented. Prepared laboratory stand was presented and described in detail. The main purpose of the work was experimental researches. A number of control process tests were conducted with variable model parameters such as additional mass, injected disturbances and so on. The results were shown on the time plots of the control object states.
REFERENCES(19)
1.
Ahangar-Asr H., Teshnehlab M., Mansouri M., Pazoki A. R. (2011), A Hybrid Strategy for the Control of Rotary Inverted Pendulum, International Conference on Electrical and Control Engineering (ICECE), 16–18 September, Yichang, China, 5656–5659.
Boubaker O. (2012), The Inverted Pendulum: A Fundamental Benchmark in Control Theory and Robotics, IEEE International Conference on Education and e-Learning Innovations, Jul.
Boubaker O. (2013), The Inverted Pendulum Benchmark in Nonlinear Control Theory: A Survey, International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, Vol. 10, 233:2013.
Hovingh A., Roon M. (2007), Design and Control of an Inverted Pendulum, Western Michigan University, Department of Aeronautical and Mechanical Engineering.
Hui L., Min Z., Chen G. (2016), Cloud-Model PID Control of Double Inverted Pendulum Based on Information Fusion, 35th Chinese Control Conference, Jul. 27–29.
Moore M. L., Musacchio J. T., Passino K. M. (2001), Genetic adaptive control for an inverted wedge: experiments and comparative analyses, Engineering Applications of Artifcial Intelligence, Vol. 14, 1–14.
Ozbek N. S., Efe M. O. (2010), ”Swing up and Stabilization Control Experiments for a Rotary Inverted Pendulum - An Educational Comparison”, International Conference on Systems Man and Cybernetics (SMC), 10-13 October, Istanbul, Turkey, 2226–2231.
Prasad L. B., Tyagi B., Gupta H. O. (2014), Optimal Control of Nonlinear Inverted Pendulum System Using PID Controller and LQR: Performance Analysis Without and With Disturbance Input, International Journal of Automation and Computing 11(6), Dec., 661–670.
Sang Y., Fan Y., Liu B. (2011), Double Inverted Pendulum Control Based on Three-loop PID and Improved BP Neural Network, Second International Conference on Digital Manufacturing and Automation (ICDMA), 5-7 August, Zhangjiajie, Hunan, China, 456–459.
Uszynski S., Ambroziak L., Kondratiuk M., Kulesza Z. (2018), Air Consumption Analysis in Compressed Air Powered Vehicles, 23rd International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation & Robotics, MMAR 2018 8486124, 837–842.
Wang H., Chamroo A., Vasseur C., Koncar V. (2008), Stabilization of a 2-DOF Inverted Pendulum by a Low Cost Visual Feedback, American Control Conference, Seattle, 11–13 Jun.
White W. N., Fales R. C. (1999), Control of a Double Inverted Pendulum with Hydraulic Actuation: A Case Study. American Control Conference, San Diego, Jun.
Zhangn X. L., Dai J. H., Cheng Y. T., Hao S., Li J. H. (2017), Nonlinear control of triple inverted pendulum based on T-S cloud inference network, Control And Decision Conference (CCDC), 28-30 May, Chongqing, China, 3290–3295.
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.