RESEARCH PAPER
Influence of the Manipulator Configuration on Vibration Effects
 
More details
Hide details
1
Rzeszów University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, Department of Applied Mechanics and Robotics, al. Powstańców Warszawy 12, 35-959 , Rzeszów, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2022-12-28
 
 
Acceptance date: 2023-05-24
 
 
Online publication date: 2023-12-30
 
 
Publication date: 2023-12-01
 
 
Acta Mechanica et Automatica 2023;17(4):515-522
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Vibration analysis of industrial robots is one of the key issues in the context of robotisation of machining processes. Low-frequency vibrations result from flexibility in manipulator joints. Within the scope of the article, a model of a two-link robot manipulator was built. Dynamic equations of motion were formulated to study the influence of the robot arm configuration on vibration effects. Based on numerical simulations, the frequency spectrum of vibrations of the robot’s links was determined, and tests were carried out in a number of configurations, obtaining a map of resonant frequencies depending on the configuration of the manipulator. Experimental studies were then carried out, which confirmed the conclusions from the simulation studies. The results obtained confirm that the positioning of the manipulator’s links has a significant effect on vibration effects. Tests conducted using a vision system with a motion amplification application made it easier to interpret the results. The formulated mathematical model of the manipulator generates results that coincide with the results of experimental studies.
REFERENCES (24)
1.
Bauer J, Friedmann M, Hemker T, Pischan M, Reinl C, Abele E, Stryk OV. Analysis of Industrial Robot Structure and Milling Process Interaction for Path Manipulation, in: Denkena, B., Hollmann, F. (Eds.), Process Machine Interactions, Lecture Notes in Production Engineering. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013; 245–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
 
2.
Ji W, Wang L. Industrial robotic machining: a review. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2019; 103, 1239–1255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170....
 
3.
Iglesias I, Sebastián MA, Ares JE. Overview of the State of Robotic Machining: Current Situation and Future Potential. Procedia Engineering. 2015;132, 911–917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proe....
 
4.
Burghardt A, Szybicki D, Kurc K, Muszyńska M. Robotic Grinding Process of Turboprop Engine Compressor Blades with Active Selection of Contact Force. Teh. Vjesn. 2022; 29(1), 15-22. https://doi.org/10.17559/TV-20....
 
5.
Gierlak P. Adaptive Position/Force Control of a Robotic Manipulator in Contact with a Flexible and Uncertain Environment. Robotics. 2021; 10, 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/roboti....
 
6.
Bisu C, Cherif M, Gerard A. K’nevez JY. Dynamic Behavior Analysis for a Six Axis Industrial Machining Robot. 2011; AMR 423, 65–76. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.sc....
 
7.
Huynh HN, Assadi H, Rivière-Lorphèvre E, Verlinden O, Ahmadi K. Modelling the dynamics of industrial robots for milling operations. Robot. Comput-Integr. Manuf. 2020; 61, 101852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim....
 
8.
Nguyen V, Johnson J, Melkote S. Active vibration suppression in robotic milling using optimal control. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2020; 152, 103541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijma....
 
9.
Busch M, Schnoes F, Elsharkawy A, Zaeh MF. Methodology for model-based uncertainty quantification of the vibrational properties of machining robots. Robot. Comput-Integr. Manuf. 2022; 73, 102243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim....
 
10.
Tunc LT, Gonul B. Effect of quasi-static motion on the dynamics and stability of robotic milling. 2021; CIRP Annals 70, 305–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp....
 
11.
İIman MM, Yavuz Ş, Karagülle H, Uysal A. Hybrid vibration control of an industrial CFRP composite robot-manipulator system based on reduced order model. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 2022; 115: 102456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simp....
 
12.
İIman MM, Yavuz Ş, Yildirim TP. Generalized input preshaping vibration control approach for multi-link flexible manipulators using-machine intelligence. Mechatronics, 2022; 82: 102735. doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2021.102735.
 
13.
Dwivedy SK, Eberhard P. Dynamic analysis of flexible manipulators, a literature review. Mech. Mach. 2006; Theory 41, 749–777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mech....
 
14.
Siciliano B, Wit CC, Bastin G. Theory of Robot Control. Springer Science & Business Media. 2012.
 
15.
Goldsmith PB, Francis BA, Goldenberg AA. Stability of hybrid position/force control applied to manipulators with flexible joints. Int. J. Robot. Autom. 1999; 14(4), 146-160.
 
16.
Vukobratovic M, Potkonjak V, Matijevic V. Dynamics of Robots with Contact Tasks. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94....
 
17.
Zhu Q, Mao Y, Xiong R, Wu J. Adaptive Torque and Position Control for a Legged Robot Based on a Series Elastic Actuator. Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 2016; 13, 26. https://doi.org/10.5772/62204.
 
18.
Do T.-T, Vu V.-H, Liu Z. Linearization of dynamic equations for vibration and modal analysis of flexible joint manipulators. Mech. Mach. 2022; Theory 167, 104516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mech....
 
19.
Endo T, Kawasaki H. Bending moment-based force control of flexible arm under gravity. Mech. Mach. 2014; Theory 79, 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mech....
 
20.
Cheong J, Youm Y. System mode approach for analysis of horizontal vibration of 3-D two-link flexible manipulators. J. Sound Vib. 2003; 268, 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-....
 
21.
Thomsen DK, Søe-Knudsen R, Balling O, Zhang X. Vibration control of industrial robot arms by multi-mode time-varying input shaping. Mech. Mach. 2021; Theory 155, 104072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mech....
 
22.
Yavuz Ş, İIman M. M. Modified reduced-order modeling of a flexible robot-manipulator and model-associative vibration control implementation. Extreme Mechanics Letters. 2020; 37, 100723.
 
23.
Khorasani K. Adaptive control of flexible joint robots. Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Sacramento, CA, USA, 1991; vol.3, 2127-2134. https://doi:10.1109/ROBOT.1991....
 
24.
Mejri S, Gagnol V, Le TP, Sabourin L, Ray P. Dynamic characterization of machining robot and stability analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 82, 2016; 351–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170....
 
eISSN:2300-5319
ISSN:1898-4088
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top