RESEARCH PAPER
THE SENSITIVITY OF A PHOTOGRAMMETRIC METHOD IN FORMABILITY ANALYSIS
 
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Technologies And Materials, Technical University of Košice, Letná 9, 042 00 Košice, Slovakia
 
 
Online publication date: 2013-12-31
 
 
Publication date: 2013-06-01
 
 
Acta Mechanica et Automatica 2013;7(2):117-123
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Nowadays is a possible to implement numerical simulation and photogrammetric inspection to the complex process chain of inspection. In the recent years there has been significant progress in accuracy improving of these methods of inspection in pre-production or post-production stage of manufacturing. This article discusses these two methods from sensitivity and comparison point of view. Most attention has been paid to the photogrammetric method and his sensitivity to using different approaches. Results were compared with the result of numerical simulation and experiment. Numerical simulation was performed in static implicit finite element code Autoform. For this purpose, GPS cover of galvanized steel of DQ category was used for inspection. In this paper was proved that photogrammetric method of strain measurement is highly sensitive on the various external factors. Further results and findings are included in the next chapters of this paper
REFERENCES (11)
1.
Fracz W., Stachowicz F., Pieja T. (2013), Aspect of verification and numerical optimization of sheet metal and numerical simulations process using the photogrammetric system, Acta Metallurgica Slovaca, 19, 51-59.
 
2.
Goellner M et al. (2010), Photogrammetric measurement of initial tooth displacement under tensile force, Medical Engineering & Physics, 32, 883-888.
 
3.
Griesbach B et al. (2010), Validation of sheet metal materials by forming analysis with automatic ARGUS measurement cell, International conference for integration of optical metrology in industry and research, Braunschweig, Germany.
 
4.
Kruse F., Wendland B. (2010), Determination of draping characteristics of carbon glassfiber textiles using Argus, International conference for integration of oprical metrology in industry and research, Braunschweig, Germany.
 
5.
Slota J., Jurčišin M. (2012), Experimental and numerical analysis of the deep drawing process using optical measuring system, Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Rzeszowskiej, 84-4, 37-45.
 
6.
Ambriško L., Pešek L. (2011), Determination the crack growth resistance of automotive steel sheets, Chemické listy, 105, 767-768.
 
7.
Hlebová S., Pešek L., Kandra T. (2011), Comparison of determination characteristics of the steel sheet in local and global area by the static loading using videoextensometry, Chemické listy, 105, 577-579.
 
8.
Mihaliková M., Ambriško L., Pešek L. (2011), Videoextensometric measuring of deformation process in automotive steel at two strain rate levels, Kovové materiály, 49, 137-141.
 
9.
ARGUS USER GUIDE. (2011), http://www.gom.com/.
 
10.
Cover story: Focus on CAD CAM and simulation. (2001), Parametric die faces in one hour, International sheet metal review.
 
11.
Schmidt A., Kunibert G.S. (2004), Design of adaptive finite element software, The finite element toolbox, Bremen: University of Bremen.
 
eISSN:2300-5319
ISSN:1898-4088
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top