RESEARCH PAPER
A Neural-Fuzzy Approach for Fault Diagnosis of Hybrid Dynamical Systems: Demonstration on Three-Tank System
1
Laboratoire d’Automatique et Informatique de Guelma (LAIG), Université 8 Mai 1945 Guelma, BP 401, Guelma , 24000, Algérie
2
Laboratory of Automatic Signal and Image Processing (LARATSI), National School of Engineers of Monastir, University of Monastir, 5019, Tunisia
Submission date: 2020-03-22
Acceptance date: 2021-03-10
Online publication date: 2021-05-15
Publication date: 2021-03-01
Acta Mechanica et Automatica 2021;15(1):1-8
KEYWORDS
hybrid dynamic systemsmodellingresidual generation and evaluationmonitoringfault diagnosisneural-fuzzy approach
ABSTRACT
This work is part of the diagnostic field of hybrid dynamic systems (HDS) whose objective is to ensure proper operation of industrial facilities. The study is initially oriented to the modelling approach dedicated to hybrid dynamical systems (HDS). The objective is to look for an adequate model encompassing both aspects (continuous and event). Then, fault diagnosis technique is synthesised using artificial intelligence (AI) techniques. The idea is to introduce a hybrid version combining neural networks and fuzzy logic for residual generation and evaluation. The proposed approach is then validated on three tank system. The modelling and diagnosis approaches are developed using MATLAB/Simulink environment.
REFERENCES (49)
1.
Abdallah I., Gehin A.-L., Bouamama B. O. (2016), Event driven hybrid bond graph for diagnosis, 2016 European Control Conference (ECC), 2353–2358.
2.
Abid A., Khan M.T., Lang H., de Silva C.W. (2019), Adaptive system identification and severity index-based fault diagnosis in motors, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 24(4), 1628–1639.
3.
Achbi M.S., Kechida S. (2017), Hybrid dynamic systems fault diagnosis approach based on hybrid automata and ANFIS, The 2 Nd International Conference on Applied Automation and Industrial Diagnostics, ICAAID2017.
4.
Achbi M.S., Kechida S. (2017a), Fault diagnosis of a reverse osmosis water desalination plant through a hybrid approach, ICENT2017.
5.
Achbi M.S., Kechida S. (2017b), Fault tolerant control of Reverse Osmosis Desalination Plant with the application of SCADA system, The 2nd International Conference on Applied Automation and Industrial Diagnostics, ICAAID2017.
6.
Achbi M.S., Kechida S. (2020), Methodology for monitoring and diagnosing faults of hybrid dynamic systems: A case study on a desalination plant, Diagnostyka, 21(1), 1641–6414.
7.
Achbi M.S., Mhamdi L., Kechida S., Dhouibi H. (2020), Methodology to knowledge discovery for fault diagnosis of hybrid dynamical systems: demonstration on two tanks system, Diagnostyka, 21.
8.
Alur R., Courcoubetis C., Henzinger T.A., Ho P.-H. (1992), Hybrid automata: An algorithmic approach to the specification and verification of hybrid systems, Hybrid systems, 209–229, Springer.
9.
Antsaklis P., Koutsoukos X. (1997), On hybrid control of complex systems: A survey, ISIS, 97, 017.
10.
Asma T., Islem L., Zanzouri N., Ksouri M. (2015), Robust diagnosis for hybrid dynamical systems, 2015 IEEE 12th International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals Devices (SSD15), 1–6.
11.
Belkacem L., Mhamdi L., Simeu-Abazi Z., Messaoud H., Gascard E. (2016), Diagnosis of Hybrid Dynamical Systems through Hybrid Automata, IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49(12), 990–995.
12.
Belkhiat D E.C., Manamanni N., Messai N., Djemai M. (2012), Fault detection isolation for a class of hybrid systems: A dedicated switched robust observer scheme, 2012 20th Mediterranean Conference on Control Automation (MED), 984–989.
13.
Belkhiat D.E.C., Messai N., Manamanni N. (2011), Design of a robust fault detection based observer for linear switched systems with external disturbances, Nonlinear Analysis: Hybrid Systems, 5(2), 206–219.
14.
Branicky M. S. (1995), Studies in hybrid systems: Modeling, analysis, and control, Massachusetts Inst Of Tech Cambridge Lab For Information And Decision Systems.
15.
Chanthery E., Pencolé Y., Ribot P., Travé-Massuyès L. (2015), HYDIAG: Extended diagnosis and prognosis for hybrid systems.
16.
Chanthery E., Sztyber A., Travé-Massuyès L., Pérez-Zuñiga C.G. (2020), Process decomposition and test selection for distributed fault diagnosis, International Conference on Industrial, Engineering and Other Applications of Applied Intelligent Systems, 914-925, Springer, Cham.
17.
Cocquempot V., El Mezyani T., Staroswiecki M. (2004), Fault detection and isolation for hybrid systems using structured parity residuals, 2004 5th Asian Control Conference (IEEE Cat. No. 04EX904), 2, 1204–1212.
18.
Daher A. (2018), Default diagnosis and prognosis for a preventive and predictive maintenance, Application to a distillation column [PhD Thesis].
19.
Deng Y., D’Innocenzo, A., Julius A.A. (2015), Trajectory-based observer for hybrid automata fault diagnosis, 2015 54th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), 942–947.
20.
Derbel H. (2009), Diagnostic à base de modèles des systèmes temporisés et d’une sous-classe de systèmes dynamiques hybrides [PhD Thesis].
21.
Ekanayake T., Dewasurendra D., Abeyratne S., Ma L., Yarlagadda P. (2019), Model-based fault diagnosis and prognosis of dynamic systems: A review, Procedia Manufacturing, 30, 435–442.
22.
Favela Contreras A. (1999), Modélisation et analyse du comportement dynamique des systèmes hybrides: Une approche basée sur le modèle d’automate hybride [PhD Thesis], Grenoble INPG.
23.
Gara H., Saad K.B. (2020), Fault diagnosis for hybrid systems based on a bank of linear observers and a discrete automaton, SN Applied Sciences, 2(11), 1-9.
24.
Guo D., Zhong M., Ji H., Liu Y., Yang R. (2018), A hybrid feature model and deep learning based fault diagnosis for unmanned aerial vehicle sensors, Neurocomputing, 319, 155-163.
25.
Jang J.-S. (1992), Neuro-fuzzy modeling: Architectures, analyses, and applications, University of California, Berkeley.
26.
Karsai G., Abdelwahed, S., Biswas, G. (2003), Integrated diagnosis and control for hybrid dynamic systems, AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, 5673.
27.
Kechida S. (2007), Synthèse des générateurs de résidus robustes pour la détection de défauts [PhD Thesis], Université de Annaba-Badji Mokhtar.
28.
Mahmoud M.S. (2018), Fuzzy control, estimation and diagnosis, Saudi Arabia: Springer International.
29.
Mhamdi L., Achbi M. S., Dhouibi H., Kechida S. (2020), Diagnosis of hybrid systems through bond graph, observers and timed automata, Diagnostyka, 21.
30.
MI Rahal B. (2018), Modeling and robust fault diagnosis of hybrid system based on hybrid bond graph approach, Int Rob Auto J, 4(4), 266–272.
31.
Olivier-Maget N., Hétreux G., Le Lann J.-M., Le Lann M.-V. (2008), Fault detection and isolation based on the model-based approach: Application on chemical processes, Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, 25, 411–416, Elsevier.
32.
Patel H.R., Raval S.K., Shah V.A. (2021), A novel design of optimal intelligent fuzzy TID controller employing GA for nonlinear level control problem subject to actuator and system component fault, International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics.
33.
Pérez-Zuñiga G., Rivas-Perez R., Sotomayor-Moriano J., Sánchez-Zurita V. (2020), Fault Detection and Isolation System Based on Structural Analysis of an Industrial Seawater Reverse Osmosis Desalination Plant, Processes, 8(9), 1100.
34.
Pisano A., Rapaić M. R., Usai E. (2014), Discontinuous dynamical systems for fault detection, A unified approach including fractional and integer order dynamics, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 95, 111–125.
35.
Pislaru M., Trandabat A.F., Schreiner C. (2006), Neuro-fuzzy surveillance for industrial process fault detection.
36.
Rivas-Perez R., Sotomayor-Moriano J., Pérez-Zuñiga G., Soto-Angles M.E. (2019), Real-time implementation of an expert model predictive controller in a pilot-scale reverse osmosis plant for brackish and seawater desalination, Applied Sciences, 9(14), 2932.
37.
Sadhukhan C., Mitra S.K., Naskar M.K., Sharifpur M. (2021), Fault diagnosis of a nonlinear hybrid system using adaptive unscented Kalman filter bank, Engineering with Computers, 1-12.
38.
Sayed-Mouchaweh M. (2018), Fault diagnosis of hybrid dynamic and complex systems, Springer.
39.
Sengupta S., Mukhopadhyay S., Deb A., Pattada K., De S. (2012), Hybrid automata modeling of SI gasoline engines towards state estimation for fault diagnosis, SAE International Journal of Engines, 5(3), 759–781.
40.
Subbaraj P., Kannapiran B. (2011), Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system approach for fault detection and diagnosis of pneumatic valve in cement industry, International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Applications, 10(04), 399–423.
41.
Sun S., Cui Z., Zhang X., Tian W. (2020), A hybrid inverse problem approach to model-based fault diagnosis of a distillation column, Processes, 8(1), 55.
42.
Tabatabaeipour S., Ravn A.P., Izadi-zamabadi R., Bak T. (2009), Active diagnosis of hybrid systems—A model predictive approach, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation, 465–470.
43.
Tsuda K., Mignone D., Ferrari-Trecate G., Morari M. (2001), Reconfiguration strategies for hybrid systems, Proceedings of the 2001 American Control Conference (Cat. No. 01CH37148), 2, 868–873.
44.
Uppal F. J., Patton R. J., Palade V. (2002), Neuro-fuzzy based fault diagnosis applied to an electro-pneumatic valve, IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 35(1), 477–482.
45.
Van Gorp J. (2013), Diagnostic et observation d’une classe de systèmes dynamiques hybrids, Application au convertisseur multicellulaire série [PhD Thesis].
46.
Vento Maldonado J., Travé-Massuyès L., Sarrate Estruch R., Puig Cayuela V. (2013), Hybrid automaton incremental construction for online diagnosis, Proceedings DX’13, 186–191.
47.
Viharos Z. J., Kis K. B. (2015), Survey on neuro-fuzzy systems and their applications in technical diagnostics and measurement, Measurement, 67, 126–136.
48.
Zhirabok A., Shumsky A. (2018), Fault diagnosis in nonlinear hybrid systems, International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, 28(4), 635–648.
49.
Zouaghi L., Alexopoulos A., Wagner A., Badreddin E. (2011), Modified particle petri nets for hybrid dynamical systems monitoring under environmental uncertainties, 2011 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII), 497–502.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2300-5319 |
| ISSN: | 1898-4088 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
