RESEARCH PAPER
Comparison Analysis of Cockroft – Latham Criterion Values of Commercial Plasticine and C45 Steel
1
Lublin University of Technology, Mechanical Engineering Faculty, Nadbystrzycka 36, 20-618 Lublin, Poland
Submission date: 2018-01-11
Acceptance date: 2018-12-18
Online publication date: 2019-01-03
Publication date: 2018-12-01
Acta Mechanica et Automatica 2018;12(4):286-293
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The paper presents and compares the results of theoretical and experimental research in the field of cracking of model material (commercial plasticine) and C45 steel in hot forming conditions. The aim of the research was to determine the limit values of the Cockroft-Latham integral for both materials. The presented research methodology includes experimental tests (tensile tests) and numerical simulations carried out in the DEFORM-3D program. For laboratory tests, axially symmetric samples made of C45 steel and model material were used. On the basis of the obtained experimental and numerical results, a comparative analysis of both materials was carried out.
REFERENCES (28)
1.
Altan T., Breitling J., Taupin E., Wu W-T. (1996), Material fracture and burr formation in blanking results of FEM simulations and comparison with experiments, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 58, 68-78.
2.
Altan T., Vazquez V., (2000), New Concepts in die design - physical and computer modeling applications, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 98, 212-223.
3.
Antolik Ł., (2014), Methodology of Fatigue Cracks Detection in Railway Axles in Comparison with European Standards Requirements (in Polish), Problemy kolejnictwa, 165, 7-19.
4.
Arikawa T., Kakimoto H., (2014), Prediction of surface crack in hot forging by numerical simulation, Procedia Engineering, 81, 474-479.
5.
Asai K., Kitamura K., (2014), Estimation of frictional property of lubricants for hot forging of steel using low-speed ring compression test, Procedia Engineering, 81,1970-1975.
6.
Assempour A., Farahani S., Naybodi A., (2012). A general methodology for bearing design in non-symmetric T-shaped sections in extrusion process, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 212(1), 249-261.
7.
Assempour A., Razi S., (2002). Determination of load and strain-stress distributions in hot closed die forging using the plasticine modeling technique, Archive of SID, 2(15), 167-172.
8.
Bariani P.F., Bylya O., Ghiotti A., Novella M.F., (2014), Modelling of AA6082 Ductile Damage Evolution under Hot Rolling Conditions, Procedia Engineering, 81, 221-226.
9.
Bruschi S., Davey K., Krishnamurthy B., (2017), Physical modelling for metal forming processes, Procedia Engineering, 207, 1075-1080.
10.
Charoesunk K., Panich S., Uthaisangsuk V., (2017). Damage initiation and fracture loci for advances high strength steel sheets taking into account anisotropic behaviour. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 248, 218-235.
11.
Cherkashina T., Mazur I., (2012), Mathematical and Physical Modeling of Soft Cobbing Process of Hot Rolling Steels, Material Science Forum, 704-705, 160-164.
12.
Cockroft M.G., Latham D.J, (1968). Ductility and the workability of metals, Journal of the Institute of Metals, 96, 33-39.
13.
Derpenski L., Seweryn A.,Szusta J., (2018), Damage accumulation and ductile fracture modeling of notched specimens under biaxial loading at room temperature, International Journal of Solids and Structures, 134, 1-19.
14.
Dziubinska A., Gontarz A., (2015), A new method for producing magnesium alloy twin-rib aircraft brackets, Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 2(87), 180-188.
15.
Eivani A. R., Jafarian H. R.,Mirghasemi S. M., Seyedein S. H. (2018), A comparison between routine vs. normalized Cockroft-Latham Fracture criteria for prediction of fracture during equal channel angular pressing, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 199, 721-729.
16.
Fu M. W., Li H., Lu J., Yang H., (2011), Ductile fracture: Experiments and computations, International Journal of Plasticity, 27, 147-180.
17.
Fuertes J. P., León J., Luis C. J., Luri R., Puertas I., Salcedo D., (2015), Comparative study of the damage attained with different specimens by FEM, Procedia Engineering, 132, 319-325.
18.
Galan I. S., Perig A.V., (2017), The experimental verification of the known flow line models describing local flow during ECAE (ECAP), Letters on materials, 7(3), 209-217.
19.
Gontarz A., Piesiak J., (2010), Crack model according to Cockroft-Latham criterion for magnesium alloy MA2 in hot forming conditions (in Polish), XXI(4), 217-227.
20.
Gontarz A., Winiarski G., (2015), Numerical and experimental study of producing flanges on hollow parts by extrusion with a movable sleeve, Archives of Metallurgy and Materials, 60, 1917-1921.
21.
Kowalczyk L., (1995), Physical modeling of metal forming processes (in Polish),Technologii Eksploatacji, Radom.
22.
Lis K., Pater Z., Walczuk P., Wojcik L.,(2018), Preliminary analysis of a rotary compression test, Adv. Sci. Technol. Res. J, 12 (2), 77-82.
23.
Lis K., Pater Z., Wojcik L.,(2016), Plastometric tests for plasticine as physical modelling material, Open Engineering, 6, 653-659.
24.
Mizuno K., Komori K., (2009), Study on plastic deformation in cone-type rotary piercing process using model piercing mill for modeling clay, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 209, 4994-5001.
25.
Moon Y.H., Van Tyne C.J., (2000), Validation via FEM and plasticine modeling of upper bound criteria of a process induced side surface defect in forgings, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 99, 185-196.
26.
Pater Z., Wojcik L.,(2017), Physical analysis of cross-wedge rolling process of a stepped shaft, Adv. Sci. Technol. Res. J., 11 (4), 60-67.
27.
Pieres F. M. A., Song N., Wu S., (2016), Numerical analysis of damage evolution form materials with tension - compression asymmetry, Procedia Structural Integrity, 1, 273-280.
28.
Rasty J., Sofuoglu H., (2000), Flow behaviour of plasticine used in physical modeling of metal forming process, Tribology International, 33, 523-529.
| eISSN: | 2300-5319 |
| ISSN: | 1898-4088 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
