RESEARCH PAPER
Data Mining Approach in Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease
 
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Medical Engineering, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 1-7, Gh Polizu, 011061, Bucharest, Romania
 
2
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Bialystok Technical University, ul. Wiejska 45C, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2021-11-02
 
 
Acceptance date: 2022-03-15
 
 
Online publication date: 2022-05-16
 
 
Publication date: 2022-09-01
 
 
Acta Mechanica et Automatica 2022;16(3):180-188
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Chronic kidney disease is a general definition of kidney dysfunction that lasts more than 3 months. When chronic kidney disease is advanced, the kidneys are no longer able to cleanse the blood of toxins and harmful waste products and can no longer support the proper function of other organs. The disease can begin suddenly or develop latently over a long period of time without the presence of characteristic symptoms. The most common causes are other chronic diseases – diabetes and hypertension. Therefore, it is very important to diagnose the disease in early stages and opt for a suitable treatment - medication, diet and exercises to reduce its side effects. The purpose of this paper is to analyse and select those patient characteristics that may influence the prevalence of chronic kidney disease, as well as to extract classification rules and action rules that can be useful to medical professionals to efficiently and accurately diagnose patients with kidney chronic disease. The first step of the study was feature selection and evaluation of its effect on classification results. The study was repeated for four models – containing all available patient data, containing features identified by doctors as major factors in chronic kidney disease, and models containing features selected using Correlation Based Feature Selection and Chi-Square Test. Sequential Minimal Optimization and Multilayer Perceptron had the best performance for all four cases, with an average accuracy of 98.31% for SMO and 98.06% for Multilayer Perceptron, results that were confirmed by taking into consideration the F1-Score, for both algorithms was above 0.98. For all these models the classification rules are extracted. The final step was action rule extraction. The paper shows that appropriate data analysis allows for building models that can support doctors in diagnosing a disease and support their decisions on treatment. Action rules can be important guidelines for the doctors. They can reassure the doctor in his diagnosis or indicate new, previously unseen ways to cure the patient.
REFERENCES (44)
1.
Chen TK, Knicely DH, Grams ME. Chronic Kidney Disease Diagnosis and Management: A Review. JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association. 2019;322(13):1294–1304. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.14745.
 
2.
Coresh J. Astor BC, Greene T, Eknoyan G, Levey AS. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease and decreased kidney function in the adult US population: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 2003;41(1):1–12. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2003.50007.
 
3.
Tuominen TK, Jämsä T, Oksanen J, Tuukkanen J, Gao TJ, Lindholm TS, Jalovaara PK. Composite implant composed of hydroxyapatite and bone morphogenetic protein in the healing of a canine ulnar defect. Annales Chirurgiae et Gynaecologiae. 2001;90(1):32-36.
 
4.
Evans PD, Taal MW. Epidemiology and causes of chronic kidney disease. Chronic Renal Failure. 2011;39(7):402–406.
 
5.
Jha V, Garcia-Garcia G, Iseki K, Li Z, Naicker S, Plattner B, et al. Chronic kidney disease: Global dimension and perspectives. The Lancet: series Global Kindey Disease. 2013;382(9888):260–272.
 
6.
Levey AS, Astor BC, Stevens LA, Coresh J. Chronic kidney disease, diabetes, and hypertension: What’s in a name. Kidney International. 2010;78(1):19–22. doi: 10.1038/ki.2010.115.
 
7.
Kunwar V, Chandel K, Sabitha AS, Bansal A. Chronic Kidney Disease analysis using data mining classification techniques. 6th International Conference - CloudSystem and Big Data Engineering (Confluence). 2016;300–305. doi: 10.1109/CONFLUENCE.2016.7508132.
 
8.
Manonmani M, Balakrishnan S. Feature Selection Using Improved Teaching Learning Based Algorithm on Chronic Kidney Disease Dataset. Procedia Computer Science. 2020;171(2019):1660–1669. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.04.178.
 
9.
Dardzińska A. Action Rules Mining. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 2013.
 
10.
Avci E, Karakus S, Ozmen O, Avci D. Performance comparison of some classifiers on Chronic Kidney Disease data. 6th International Symposium on Digital Forensic and Security (ISDFS). 2018;1-4. doi: 10.1109/ISDFS.2018.8355392.
 
11.
Rady EHA, Anwar AS. Prediction of kidney disease stages using data mining algorithms. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked. 2019;15:100178. doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2019.100178.
 
12.
Akben SB. Early Stage Chronic Kidney Disease Diagnosis by Applying Data Mining Methods to Urinalysis, Blood Analysis and Disease History. IRBM. 2018;39(5):353–358. doi: 10.1016/j.irbm.2018.09.004.
 
13.
Simunovic VL. Basic & General Clinical Skills. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. 2013.
 
14.
Freeth A. Diabetes Causes, Myths, Treatment, and Home Care. eMediHealth. 2019.
 
15.
Jujo K, Minami Y, Haruki S, Matsue Y, Shimazaki K, Kadowaki H, Ishida I, Kambayashi K, Arashi H, Sekiguchi H, Hagiwara N. Persistent high blood urea nitrogen level is associated with increased risk of cardiovaserum creatinineular events in patients with acute heart failure. ESC Heart Failure, 2017;4(4):545–553.
 
16.
Piñol-Ripoll G, De La Puerta I, Purroy F. Serum creatinine is an inadequate screening test for renal failure in ischemic stroke patients. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. 2009;120(1):47–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2008.01120.x.
 
17.
Strazzullo P, Leclercq C. Nutriente information: Sodium. Advances in Nutrition. 2014;5(2):188–90 doi: 10.3945/an.113.005215.
 
18.
Kardalas E, Paschou SA, Anagnostis P, Muscogiuri G, Siasos G, Vryonidou A. Hypokalemia: A clinical update. Endocrine Connections. 2018;7(4):135–146. doi: 10.1530/EC-18-0109.
 
19.
Walker HK, Hall WD HJ. Clinical Methods: The History, Physical, and Laboratory Examinations. 3rd edition. 1990.
 
20.
Fairbanks VF, Tefferi A. Normal ranges for packed cell volume and hemoglobin concentration in adults: Relevance to “apparent polycythemia.” European Journal of Haematology. 2000;65(5): 285–296. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0609.2000.065005285.x.
 
21.
White Blood Cell Count. Nursing Critical Care. 2019;14:1-40. doi: 10.1097/01.CCN.0000549633.67301.6d.
 
22.
Red Blood Cell Count. Nursing Critical Care. 2020;15(1):1-38. doi: 10.1097/01.CCN.0000612852.86589.d2.
 
23.
Hall MA. Correlation-based Feature Selection for Machine Learning. Doctoral thesis. University of Waikato. 1999.
 
24.
Sun J, Zhang X, Liao D, Chang V. Efficient method for feature selection in text classification. 2017 International Conference on Engineering and Technology (ICET). 2017;1–6. doi: 10.1109/ICEngTechnol.2017.8308201.
 
25.
An TK, Kim MH. A new Diverse AdaBoost classifier. Artificial Intelligence and Computational Intelligence. 2010;1:359–363. doi: 10.1109/AICI.2010.82.
 
26.
Kegl B, Introduction to AdaBoost. 2014. Available from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/v..., 10 October 2021.
 
27.
Zeng ZQ, Yu H Bin, Xu HR, Xie YQ, Gao J. Fast training Support Vector Machines using parallel Sequential Minimal Optimization. rd International Conference on Intelligent System and Knowledge Engineering. 2008;997–1001. doi: 10.1109/ISKE.2008.4731075.
 
28.
Abirami S, Chitra P. Energy-efficient edge based real-time healthcare support system. Advances in Computers. 2020;117(1):339–368. doi: 10.1016/bs.adcom.2019.09.007.
 
29.
Kumar Y, Sahoo G. Analysis of Parametric & Non Parametric Classifiers for Classification Technique using WEKA. International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science 2012; 4(7):43–9. doi: 10.5815/ijitcs.2012.07.06.
 
30.
Humphris CW. Computer Science Principles V10. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. 2013.
 
31.
Saravana N, Gayathri V. Performance and Classification Evaluation of J48 Algorithm and Kendall’s Based J48 Algorithm (KNJ48). International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology. 2018;59(2):73–80. doi: 10.14445/22312803/ijctt-v59p112.
 
32.
Waseem S, Salman A, Muhammad AK. Feature subset selection using association rule mining and JRip classifier. International Journal of Physical Sciences. 2013;8(18):885–96. doi: 10.5897/ijps2013.3842.
 
33.
Lewis RJ, Ph D, Street WC. An Introduction to Classification and Regression Tree (CART) Analysis. 2000. Available from: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/..., 10 October 2021.
 
34.
Frank E, Witten IH. Generating accurate rule sets without global optimization. Hamilton, New Zealand: University of Waikato, Department of Computer Science. 1998.
 
35.
Kalmegh S. Analysis of WEKA Data Mining Algorithm REPTree, Simple Cart and RandomTree for Classification of Indian News. International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology. 2015;2(2):438–446.
 
36.
Bro R, Kjeldahl K, Smilde AK, Kiers HAL. Cross-validation of component models: A critical look at current methods. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2008;390(5):1241–1251. doi: 10.1007/s00216-007-1790-1.
 
37.
Kohavi R. A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection. Morgan Kaufmann. 1995.
 
38.
Novakovic J, Veljovi A, Iiic S, Papic Z, Tomovic M. Evaluation of Classification Models in Machine Learning. Theory and Applications of Mathematics & Computer Science. 2017;7(1):39–46.
 
39.
Aggarwal CC. [ed.] Data Classification - Algorithms and Applications, Chapman and Hall/CRC. 2014.
 
40.
Maimon O, Rokach L. [ed.] Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook: A Complete Guide for Practitioners and Researchers. Berlin, Springer. 2005.
 
41.
Ras ZW, Dardzinska A. Action Rules Discovery Based on Tree Classifiers and Meta-actions. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. 2009;5722;66–75.
 
42.
Ras ZW, Dardzinska A. Action Rules Discovery without Pre-existing Classification Rules. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2008; 5306:181-190.
 
43.
Jongbo OA. Adetunmb AO, Ogunrinde RB, Badeji-Ajisafe B. Development of an ensemble approach to chronic kidney disease diagnosis. Scientific African, 2020;8:e00456. doi: 10.1016/j.sciaf.2020.e00456.
 
44.
Senan EM, Al-Adhaileh MH, Alsaade FW, et al. Diagnosis of Chronic Kidney Disease Using Effective Classification Algorithms and Recursive Feature Elimination Techniques. Journal of Healthcare Engineering. 2021;2021:1004767. doi: 10.1155/2021/1004767.
 
eISSN:2300-5319
ISSN:1898-4088
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top