RESEARCH PAPER
Calculation of the Optimal Braking Force Distribution in Three-Axle Trailers with Tandem Suspension
 
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Bialystok University of Technology, ul. Wiejska 45C, 15-351 Białystok, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2022-02-08
 
 
Acceptance date: 2022-03-16
 
 
Online publication date: 2022-05-16
 
 
Publication date: 2022-09-01
 
 
Acta Mechanica et Automatica 2022;16(3):189-199
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Heavy agricultural trailers can be equipped with a three-axle chassis with a tandem axle set at the rear and one mounted on a turntable at the front. In such trailers, selection of the distribution of braking forces that meet the requirements of the EU Directive 2015/68, with regard to braking, largely depends on the type of tandem suspension used. The requirements for brake force distribution in agricultural trailers of categories R3 and R4 are described. On this basis, a methodology for calculating the optimal linear distribution of braking forces, characteristic of agricultural trailers with air braking systems, was developed. An analysis of the forces acting on a 24-tonne three-axle trailer during braking was performed for five different suspensions of the rear tandem axle. An optimization algorithm using the quasi Monte Carlo method was described, on the basis of which a computer program for selection of the linear distribution of braking forces was developed. The calculations were made for an empty and loaded trailer with and without the weight of the tandem suspension. The most uniform distribution of braking forces was obtained for two leaf spring with dynamic equalization and air suspension, in which the ratio of the braking force of the tandem axle and the total braking force varied between 22.9% and 25.5% for the different calculation variants. A large variation in the braking force distribution was achieved for the two leaf spring suspension, in which the ratio of tandem axle braking force and the total braking force ranged from 2.7% to 6.4% for the leading axle and from 27.8% to 36.2% for the trailing axle. The presented calculation methodology can be used in the initial phase of the design of air braking systems for three-axle agricultural trailers.
REFERENCES (35)
1.
Agriculture Equipment Brochure. 2015. Available from: http://www.bpwtranspec.com.au/....
 
2.
Burkardt J. The Hammersley Quasi Monte Carlo (QMC) Sequence. Available from: https://people.sc.fsu.edu/~jbu....
 
3.
Colaert Essieux. General Catalogue. 2019. Available from: http://www.colaertessieux.fr/P....
 
4.
Day A.J. Braking of Road Vehicles. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2014.
 
5.
Dimov IT. Monte Carlo Methods for Applied Scientists. World Scientific; 2007. Available from: https://www.worldscientific.co....
 
6.
European Commission. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/68 of 15 October 2014 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to vehicle braking requirements for the approval of agricultural and forestry vehicles. 2015.
 
7.
Fancher P, Winkler C. Directional performance issues in evaluation and design of articulated heavy vehicles. Vehicle System Dynamics. 2007;45(7–8):607–47.
 
8.
Gillmann R. Axle spacing and load equivalency factors. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 1999;1655(1):227–32.
 
9.
Glišović J, Lukić J, Šušteršič V, Ćatić D. Development of tractors and trailers in accordance with the requirements of legal regulations. In: 9th International Quality Conference. Faculty of Engineering, University of Kragujevac; 2015; 193–202.
 
10.
Goodarzi A, Behmadi M, Esmailzadeh E. An optimised braking force distribution strategy for articulated vehicles. Vehicle System Dynamics. 2008;46(sup1):849–56.
 
11.
Ha, DV, Tan, VV., Niem, VT., Sename, O. Evaluation of Dynamic Load Reduction for a Tractor Semi-Trailer Using the Air Suspension System at all Axles of the Semi-Trailer. Actuators 2022;11:12. https://doi.org/10.3390/act110....
 
12.
Hammersley JM. Monte Carlo methods for solving multivariable problems. Numerical Properties of Functions of Moe Than One Independent Variable. 1960;86(3):844–74.
 
13.
Harwood DW. Review of Truck Characteristics as Factors in Roadway Design. Washington, D.C.: Transportation Research Board; 2003. Available from: https://www.nap.edu/catalog/23....
 
14.
Heisler H. 10 - Suspension. In: Heisler H, editor. Advanced Vehicle Technology. 2nd ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2002; 368–449.
 
15.
ISO 8855:2011. Road vehicles — Vehicle dynamics and roadholding.
 
16.
Kamiński Z, Radzajewski P. Calculations of the optimal distribution of brake force in agricultural vehicles categories R3 and R4. Eksploat i Niezawodn. 2019;21(4):645–53.
 
17.
Kroese DP, Taimre T, Botev ZI. Handbook of Monte Carlo Methods. Wiley; 2011.
 
18.
Limpert R. Engineering Design Handbook: Analysis and Design of Automotive Brake Systems. HQ, US Army Materiel Development and Readiness Command; 1976.
 
19.
Limpert R. An investigation of the brake force distribution on tractorsemitrailer combinations. Society of Automotive Engineers; 1971. Available from: https://www.sae.org/content/71....
 
20.
Miatluk M, Kaminski Z. Brake systems of road vehicles. Calculations. Bialystok: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Bialostockiej; 2005.
 
21.
Mital A, Desai A, Subramanian A, Mital A. Product development: A structured approach to consumer product development, design, and manufacture. 2nd ed. Elsevier Science; 2014.
 
22.
Morton DP, Popova E. Monte-Carlo Simulations for Stochastic Optimization. In: Encyclopedia of Optimization. Boston, MA: Springer US; 1529–37.
 
23.
NHTSA heavy duty vehicle brake research program: Report no. 1 ‒ stopping capability of air braked vehicles. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 1985. by Richard W. Radlinski and S. F. Williams. Available from: https://books.google.pl/books?....
 
24.
Nunney MJ. Light and Heavy Vehicle Technology. Routledge; 2007.
 
25.
Pierce PR. Controlled load transfer during braking on a four-spring trailer suspension. Society of Automotive Engineers; 1985. Available from: https://www.sae.org/content/85....
 
26.
[26] Road Safety Authority. Revised Standards for Agricultural Vehicles RSA Guide. Ballina, Republic of Ireland: Road Safety Authority; 2015.
 
27.
Sun B, Wang P, Gao S, Yu J, Wang Z. Development of braking force distribution strategy for Dual-Motor-Drive Electric Vehicle. Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences. 2018;50(2):179–201.
 
28.
Tang G, Zhao H, Wu J, Zhang Y. Optimization of braking force distribution for three-axle truck. Society of Automotive Engineers; 2013. Available from: https://www.sae.org/content/20....
 
29.
Titan Agricultural Catalogue – Tires, wheels, tracks, axles. 2015. Available from: http://titanaust.com.au/wp-con....
 
30.
Van Straelen B. Lastverlagerung und Bremskraftverteilung bei Einachs- und Doppelachsanhängern. Grundlagen der Landtechnik. 1983;33(6):183–9.
 
31.
Venkataraman P. Applied Optimization with MATLAB Programming. 2nd ed. Hoboken: Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2009.
 
32.
WABCO. Pneumatic Braking System Agriculture and Forestry. Product Catalogue. 2017. Available from: https://www.wabcocustomercentr....
 
33.
Wong T-T, Luk W-S, Heng P-A. Sampling with Hammersley and Halton Points. Journal of Graphics Tools. 1997;2(2):9–24.
 
34.
Xu J, Zhang X. Optimization algorithm for vehicle braking force distribution of front and rear axles based on brake strength. 12th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation (WCICA). IEEE; 2016; 3353–60.
 
35.
Zhao LH, Cao QG, Li YS, Gao NZ. An optimization technique of braking force distribution coefficient for truck. Proceedings 2011 International Conference on Transportation, Mechanical, and Electrical Engineering (TMEE). IEEE. 2011;1784–7.
 
eISSN:2300-5319
ISSN:1898-4088
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top