RESEARCH PAPER
Integrating Humans Into Industry 5.0 Production Systems. A Theoretical Model
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Mechanical and Energy Engineering, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland
2
Branch in Szczecinek, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland
These authors had equal contribution to this work
Submission date: 2026-02-24
Final revision date: 2026-05-23
Acceptance date: 2026-05-25
Publication date: 2026-06-19
Corresponding author
Anna ZAWADA-TOMKIEWICZ
Faculty of Mechanical and Energy Engineering, Koszalin University of Technology, Raclawicka 15-17, 75-950, Koszalin, Poland
Acta Mechanica et Automatica 2026;20(2):421-432
HIGHLIGHTS
- Human roles redistributed across abstraction layers in machining
- Three functional operator roles defined in a human-centric model
- Collaborative Intelligence mediates human–machine decisions
- ISA-95 integrated with Human-centric Manufacturing architecture
- Automated drilling used as autonomous machining reference case
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The objective of this paper is to structure the role of the human in metal machining by organising operator participation into three functional roles and analysing their evolution across increasing levels of automation. Using drilling operations as a representative case study, the research integrates the Human-centric Manufacturing Model with the ISA-95 architecture to compare human involvement in classical, automated and autonomous production environments. The results indicate a systematic shift of human contribution from direct physical execution toward supervisory, cognitive and organisational functions. Advances in machine learning, digital twins and multi-sensor monitoring - together with increasing material complexity such as composite stacks and additively manufactured components - transform machining into a data-driven process requiring human validation and interpretation rather than manual intervention. Consequently, boundary physical roles diminish, while cognitive-augmented and analytical-organisational roles become central to planning, monitoring and governance of autonomous systems. The findings show that increasing autonomy does not eliminate the human from manufacturing but redefines the operator as a supervisor, interpreter and orchestrator of cyber-physical production systems, supporting safety, reliability and continuous improvement in Industry 5.0 environments.
REFERENCES (54)
1.
Gaffinet B, Al Haj Ali J, Naudet Y, Panetto H. Human digital twins: A systematic literature review and concept disambiguation for Industry 5.0. Computers in Industry. 2025;166:104230.
2.
Bhattacharya M, Penica M, O’Connell E, Southern M, Hayes M. Human-in-the-loop: A review of smart manufacturing deployments. Sys-tems. 2023;11(1):35.
3.
Romero D, Bernus P, Noran O, Stahre J, Fast-Berglund Å. The Opera-tor 4.0: Human cyber-physical systems and adaptive automation to-wards human-automation symbiosis work systems. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. 2016;488:677-686.
4.
Krakowski S. Human-AI agency in the age of generative AI. Infor-mation and Organization. 2025;35(1):100560.
5.
EN 614-1:2006+A1:2009. Safety of machinery — Ergonomic design principles — Part 1: Terminology and general principles.
6.
EN 614-2:2000+A1:2008. Safety of machinery — Ergonomic design principles — Part 2: Interactions between the design of machinery and work tasks.
7.
Magyar G, Geier N. Analysis and modelling of thrust force in drilling of basalt and carbon fibre-reinforced polymer composites. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering. 2023;45(6):323.
8.
Patel P, Chaudhary V. Critical thrust force prediction in unidirectional CFRP drilling: An analytical modeling approach. Proceedings of the In-stitution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engi-neering Science. 2024;238(10):4513-4525.
9.
Chen C, Hu J, Zhang L, Chen Y, Shi J. Identification method for safety hazard behavior in offshore drilling operators. Ocean Engineering. 2024;301:117447.
10.
Nargis T, Shahabaz SM, Acharya S, Shetty N, Malghan RL, Shetty SD. A comprehensive study on the optimization of drilling performance in hybrid nano-composites and neat CFRP composites using statistical and machine learning approaches. Journal of Manufacturing and Materi-als Processing. 2024;8(2):67.
11.
Koç S. Development of a program for automatic calculation of the delamination factor using image processing techniques. Journal of Composite Materials. 2025;59(28):3201-3214.
12.
Haoua AA, Rey PA, Chérif M, Abisset-Chavanne E, Yousfi W. Materi-al recognition method to enable adaptive drilling of multi-material aero-space stacks. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Tech-nology. 2024;131(2):779-796.
13.
Hamed M, Zhang C, Mashood Khan AM, Saleem M, Musanur MD. Holistic review of drilling on CFRP composites: Techniques, FEM, sus-tainability, challenges, and advances. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2024;135(5-6):2661-2696.
14.
Hrechuk A, Hörndahl M, Schultheiss F. Research solution for automatic hole quality analysis when drilling fiber-reinforced composites. Interna-tional Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2023;127(7-8):3315-3324.
15.
Benkhelladi A, Laouissi A, Aouici H, Bouchoucha A, Karmi Y, Chetbani Y. Assessment of hybrid composite drilling and prediction of cutting pa-rameters by ANFIS and deep neural network approach. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2024;135(1-2):589-606.
16.
Zhang X, Li M, Huang D. Surface quality and burr characterization during drilling CFRP/Al stacks with acoustic emission monitoring. Jour-nal of Manufacturing Processes. 2023;98:138-148.
17.
Beigi A, Bastani Lay A, Ahmadi Najafabadi M. Acoustic emission-based delamination investigation in drilled GFRP under mixed tensile and bending cyclic loading. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Compo-sites. 2026;45(3-4):597-609.
18.
Lee SKH, Simeth A, Hinchy EP, Plapper P, O’Dowd NP, McCarthy CT. A vision-based hole quality assessment technique for robotic drilling of composite materials using a hybrid classification model. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2023;129(3-4):1249-1258.
19.
Mattera G, Marchesano MG, Caggiano A, Guizzi G, Nele L. Process monitoring of one-shot drilling of Al/CFRP aeronautical stacks using the 1DCAE-GMM framework. Electronics. 2025;14(9):1777.
20.
Caggiano A, Mattera G, Nele L. Smart tool wear monitoring of CFRP/CFRP stack drilling using autoencoders and memory-based neu-ral networks. Applied Sciences. 2023;13(5):3307.
21.
David AG, Ramalingam VS, Florence EF. A novel real time sensing framework for assessment of thrust force in drilling of composites using Taguchi and NSGA-II. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical En-gineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science. 2024;238(9):3941-3954.
22.
Shetty S, Shetty R, Nayak R, Hegde A, Shetty UK, Sudheer M. DOE coupled MLP-ANN for optimization of thrust force and torque during drilling of CCFRP composite laminates. Cogent Engineering. 2024;11(1):2319397.
23.
Ducobu F, Beuscart T, Erice B, Cuesta M, Lauwers B, Arrazola PJ. A mechanistic-finite element hybrid approach to modelling cutting forces when drilling GFRP-AISI 304 stacks. CIRP Annals. 2023;72(1):69-72.
24.
Liu Y, Pan Z, Wang T, Zhou H. Multi-scale thermo-mechanical coupling for woven CF/PEEK composite based on modified micro-mechanics of failure criterion: Drilling simulation modeling and validation. Journal of Manufacturing Processes. 2026;157:1123-1142.
25.
Zawada-Tomkiewicz A, Tomkiewicz D, Pela M. Identification of a workpiece temperature compensation model for automatic correction of the cutting process. Materials. 2022;15:8372.
26.
Kim DB, Bajestani MS, Lee JY, Shin SJ, Kim GY, Sajadieh SMM, Noh S. Human-in-the-loop in smart manufacturing (H-SM): A review and perspective. Journal of Manufacturing Systems. 2025;82:178-199.
27.
Zheng P, Wang H, Sang Z., Zhong RY, Liu Y, Liu C, Mubarok K, Yu S, Xu X. Smart manufacturing systems for Industry 4.0: Conceptual framework, scenarios, and future perspectives. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering. 2018;13(2):137-150.
28.
Lim JM, Song W, Lee JS, Park JM, Shin HM, Oh IW, Hwang SH, Jeong S, Kang S, Lee CY, Min BK. Recent advances in CNC technol-ogy: Toward autonomous and sustainable manufacturing. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing. 2025;26:2311-2344.
29.
Peng Y, Ding Z, Tian Y, Kang W, Yu F, Yao X, Luan C, Hu S, Fu J Toward new-generation intelligent machine tools: State-of-the-art and fu-ture prospects of AI in CNC machine tools. International Journal of Ad-vanced Manufacturing Technology. 2026.
30.
Zawada-Tomkiewicz A, Gąsiewicz Ł, Strelke J. Developing a predictive wear model for intelligent tool change systems. Acta Mechanica et Au-tomatica. 2025;19:Article 3.
31.
Pimenov DY, Bustillo A, Wojciechowski S, Sharma VS, Gupta MK, Kuntoğlu M. Artificial intelligence systems for tool condition monitoring in machining: Analysis and critical review. Journal of Intelligent Manu-facturing. 2023;34:2079-2121.
32.
Zawada-Tomkiewicz A, Tomkiewicz D, Gąsiewicz Ł. Development of the geometric measurement system for machined surface evaluation in cutting. Measurement. 2026;257(Part C):118856.
33.
Hoffmann N, Prokop G, Weidner R. Methodologies for evaluating exoskeletons with industrial applications. Ergonomics. 2022;65(2):276-295.
34.
Panico M., Boccarusso L. Smart drilling: Integrating AI for process optimisation and quality enhancement in manufacturing. Journal of Man-ufacturing and Materials Processing. 2025;9(12):386.
35.
Xu X, Ji T, Zheng P, Wang L. Human-centric manufacturing: Re-thinking, re-justifying, and re-envisioning. Journal of Manufacturing Sys-tems. 2026;84:259-268.
36.
Dhanda M, Rogers BA, Hall S, Dekoninck E, Dhokia V. Reviewing human-robot collaboration in manufacturing: Opportunities and challeng-es in the context of Industry 5.0. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing. 2025;93:102937.
37.
ISO/TS 15066:2016. Robots and robotic devices — Collaborative robot.
38.
Chemweno P, Pintelon L, Decre W. Orienting safety assurance with outcomes of hazard analysis and risk assessment: A review of the ISO 15066 standard for collaborative robot systems. Safety Science. 2020;129:104832.
39.
Gladysz B, Tran TA, Romero D, van Erp T, Abonyi J, Ruppert T. Current development on the Operator 4.0 and transition towards the Operator 5.0: A systematic literature review in light of Industry 5.0. Journal of Manufacturing Systems. 2023;70:160-185.
40.
Lu Y, Zheng H, Chand S, Xia W, Liu Z, Xu X, Wang L, Qin Z, Bao J. Outlook on human-centric manufacturing towards Industry 5.0. Journal of Manufacturing Systems. 2022;62:612-627.
41.
O’Keeffe V, Jang R, Manning K, Trott R, Howard S, Hordacre AL, Spoehr J. Forming a view: A human factors case study of augmented reality collaboration in assembly. Ergonomics. 2024;67(12):1828-1844.
42.
Fernández-Moyano JA, Remolar I, Gómez-Cambronero Á. Augmented reality’s impact in industry: A scoping review. Applied Sciences. 2025;15(5):2415.
43.
Radhakrishnan U, Koumaditis K, Chinello F. A systematic review of immersive virtual reality for industrial skills training. Behaviour & Infor-mation Technology. 2021;40(12):1310-1339.
44.
Afif MF, Sarhan AAD. Computer-aided process planning, digital twin, and smart manufacturing: Interconnections and integration in CNC ma-chining processes. International Journal of Production Research. 2025;63(24):9593-9632.
45.
da Silva LRR, Pimenov DY, da Silva RB, Ercetin A, Giasin K. Review of applications of digital twins and Industry 4.0 for machining. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing. 2025;9:211.
46.
Fu X, Song H, Li S, Lu Y. Digital twin technology in modern machining: A comprehensive review of research on machining errors. Journal of Manufacturing Systems. 2025;79:134-161.
47.
Isaza Domínguez L. Digital twins in Industry 5.0: A systematic litera-ture review. European Public & Social Innovation Review. 2024;9:1-21.
48.
Baratta A, Cimino A, Longo F, Nicoletti L. Digital twin for human-robot collaboration enhancement in manufacturing systems: Literature review and direction for future developments. Computers & Industrial Engineer-ing. 2024;187:109764.
49.
Borghoff UM, Bottoni P, Pareschi R. Human-artificial interaction in the age of agentic AI: A system-theoretical approach. Frontiers in Human Dynamics. 2025;7:1579166.
50.
Kumar A.S., Agarwal A., Jansari V.G., Desai K.A., Chattopadhyay C., Mears L. HG-XAI: Human-guided tool wear identification approach through augmentation of explainable artificial intelligence with machine vision. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. 2025;36(7):4807-4822.
51.
IEC 62264-1:2013. Enterprise-control system integration — Part 1: Models and terminology.
52.
Baldassarre A, Lulli LG, Cavallo F, Fiorini L, Mariniello A, Mucci N, Arcangeli G. Industrial exoskeletons from bench to field: Human-machine interface and user experience in occupational settings and tasks. Frontiers in Public Health. 2022;10:1039680.
53.
Cardoso A, Ribeiro A, Carneiro P, Colim A. Evaluating exoskeletons for WMSD prevention: A systematic review of applications and ergo-nomic approach in occupational settings. International Journal of Envi-ronmental Research and Public Health. 2024;21(12):1695.
54.
Souchet AD, Lourdeaux D, Pagani A, Rebenitsch L. A narrative review of immersive virtual reality’s ergonomics and risks at the workplace. Vir-tual Reality. 2023;27:19-50.