RESEARCH PAPER
Numerical Investigation of Turbulent Drag Reduction Mechanisms in Newtonian Fluid Pipes with Energy Promoter Rings
1
Laboratory of Transportation and Environment Engineering (LITE), Department of Transport Engineering, University of Constantine, Constantine 25000, Algeria
2
Al-Naji University, Baghdad, Iraq
3
UDERZA Unit, Faculty of Technology, University of El-Oued, 39000, El-Oued, Algeria
4
Department of Energy Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Baghdad, Iraq
5
Department of Mechanics, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan
6
Institute of Laser and Systems Technologies (iLAS), Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Hamburg, Germany
Publication date: 2026-03-26
Acta Mechanica et Automatica 2026;20(1):242-252
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
This study numerically investigates steady-state turbulent flow in circular pipes equipped with energy-promoter rings to enhance flow efficiency and reduce drag. Using the Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations with the standard k–ε turbulence model implemented in ANSYS Fluent, the effects of energy-promoter geometry and spacing were analysed for water flow at high Reynolds numbers. Mesh independence and validation against empirical correlations confirmed the reliability of the numerical model. Results show that the curved energy-promoter design consistently outperforms the simple configuration by providing smoother turbulence modulation and lower wall shear stress. Decreasing the spacing between rings enhances the drag-reduction effect, with the optimum configuration (curved design, 50 mm spacing) achieving a maximum drag-reduction efficiency of approxi-mately 9 %. The analysis of velocity fields and pressure-drop behavior reveals that the promoters weaken near-wall turbulence and reduce energy dissipation without introducing excessive pressure penalties. These findings demonstrate the potential of passive energy-promoter rings as a cost-effective method for improving the hydraulic performance of turbulent Newtonian pipe flows in in-dustrial transport systems.
REFERENCES (43)
1.
Rushd S, Ferroudji H, Yousuf H, Walker T W, Basu A, Sen TK. Applications of drag reducers for the pipeline transportation of heavy crude oils: A critical review and future research direc-tions. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2024;102(1):438-458.
2.
Hoshyargar V, Ashrafizadeh S N. Optimization of flow parame-ters of heavy crude oil-in-water emulsions through pipelines. In-dustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2013; 52(4):1600-1611.
3.
Ashrafizadeh S, Kamran M. Emulsification of heavy crude oil in water for pipeline transportation. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 2010; 71(3-4): 205-211.
4.
Behrouz M, Dinarvand S, Yazdi M E, Tamim H, Pop I, Chamkha AJ. Mass-based hybridity model for thermomicropolar binary nanofluid flow: first derivation of angular momentum equation. Chinese Journal of Physics. 2023; 83:165-184.
6.
Aliakbarzadeh Kashani D, Dinarvand S, Pop I, Hayat T. Effects of dissolved solute on unsteady double-diffusive mixed convec-tive flow of a Buongiorno’s two-component nonhomogeneous nanofluid. International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow. 2019; 29(1): 448-466.
7.
Berrehal H, Karami R, Dinarvand S, Pop I, Chamkha A. Entropy generation analysis for convective flow of aqua Ag-CuO hybrid nanofluid adjacent to a warmed down-pointing rotating vertical cone. International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow. 2024; 34(2):878-900.
8.
Gu Y, Yu S, Mou J, Wu D, Zheng S. Research progress on the collaborative drag reduction effect of polymers and surfactants. Materials. 2020;13(2):444.
9.
Han WJ, Dong YZ, Choi HJ. Applications of water-soluble poly-mers in turbulent drag reduction. Processes. 2017; 5(2): 24.
10.
Wang Y, Yu B, Zakin JL, Shi H. Review on drag reduction and its heat transfer by additives. Advances in Mechanical Engineer-ing. 2011; 3: 478749.
11.
Zakin JL, Zhang Y, Ge W. Drag reduction by surfactant giant micelles. Giant Micelles. 2007:473-492.
12.
Xu Z, Zhao M, Xie Y, Li T, Meng X, Dong Y, Yang Z, Dai C. Nanoslickwater Fracturing Fluid with Enhanced Imbibition Ca-pacity for Low-Permeability Reservoirs. Energy&Fuels; 2024;.
13.
Mansourian M, Dinarvand S, Pop I. Aqua cobalt ferrite/Mn–Zn ferrite hybrid nanofluid flow over a nonlinearly stretching perme-able sheet in a porous medium. Journal of Nanofluids. 2022;11(3):383-391.
14.
Niazi M, Ashrafizadeh SN, Hashemabadi SH, Karami H. Novel k-ω turbulent model for prediction of drag reduction in viscoelastic fluid flow. Industrial&Engineering Chemistry Research. 2024;63(50): 22177-22191.
15.
Niazi M, Ashrafizadeh SN, Hashemabadi SH. Improving the prediction of turbulent kinetic energy for drag reduction in turbu-lent viscoelastic pipe flow. Physics of Fluids. 2024; 36(6).
16.
Dastbaz Z, Dana SN, Ashrafizadeh SN. Preparation of a stabi-lized aqueous polystyrene suspension via phase inversion. RSC advances. 2021;11(29):17547-17557.
17.
Dastbaz Z, Ashrafizadeh SN. Preparation, stabilization, and characterization of polyisobutylene aqueous suspension. Col-loid and Polymer Science. 2020; 298(10):1335-1347.
18.
Dastbaz Z, Ashrafizadeh SN. Intensifying the performance of polymer suspensions to evaluate drag reduction using rotating disc apparatus. Arabian Journal of Chemistry. 2024; 17(8): 105858.
19.
Choi C-H, Ulmanella U, Kim J, Ho C-M, Kim C-J. Effective slip and friction reduction in nanograted superhydrophobic micro-channels. Physics of fluids. 2006; 18(8).
20.
Daniello R J, Waterhouse NE, Rothstein JP. Drag reduction in turbulent flows over superhydrophobic surfaces. Physics of Flu-ids. 2009; 21(8).
21.
Ameur H. Effect of corrugated baffles on the flow and thermal fields in a channel heat exchanger. Journal of Applied and Com-putational Mechanics. 2020;6(2):209-218.
22.
Mohammadikarachi A, Yousif M Z, Nugroho B, Lim H-C. An ex-haustive review of studies on bio-inspired convergent–divergent riblets. Ocean Engineering. 2024;295:116965.
23.
Ran W, Zare A, Jovanović MR. Model-based design of riblets for turbulent drag reduction. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 2021;906: A7.
24.
Muñóz AJ, Reca J, Martínez J. Application of a hydrophobic coating to a pressurized pipe and its effect on energy losses and fluid flow profile. Scientific Reports. 2024; 14(1): 8236.
25.
Marensi E, Ding Z, Willis AP, Kerswell RR. Designing a minimal baffle to destabilise turbulence in pipe flows. Journal of Fluid Me-chanics. 2020; 900: A31.
26.
Zhu C, Wang T, Wu J. Numerical investigation of passive vortex generators on a wind turbine airfoil undergoing pitch oscilla-tions. Energies. 2019;12(4):654.
27.
Al-Kayiem H, Khan J. CFD simulation of drag reduction in pipe flow by turbulence energy promoters. ARPN Journal of Engi-neering and Applied Sciences. 2016;11(24):14219-14224.
28.
Karami HR, Keyhani M, Mowla D. Experimental analysis of drag reduction in the pipelines with response surface methodology. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 2016;138:104-112.
29.
Waskito KT. Drag reduction and velocity profiles distribution of crude oil flow in spiral pipes. International Review of Mechanical Engineering. 2015; 9(1):1-10.
30.
Mucharam L, Rahmawati S, Ramadhani R. Drag reducer selec-tion for oil pipeline based laboratory experiment. Modern Ap-plied Science. 2018;12(1):112-112.
31.
Gong W, Shen J, Dai W, Li K, Gong M. Research and applica-tions of drag reduction in thermal equipment: A review. Interna-tional Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2021;172:121152.
32.
Al-Kayiem HH, Othman A, Abed AB, Tukkee AM. Experimental Evaluation of Drag Reduction in Pipe Flow Using Streamlined Turbulence Modifiers. Springer; 2022.
34.
Munson BR, Okiishi TH, Huebsch WW, Rothmayer AP. Fluid mechanics. Wiley Singapore; 2013.
35.
Hossain MS, Hossain MI, Pramanik S, Ahamed JU. Analyzing the Turbulent Flow Characteristics by Utilizing k-? Turbulence Model. European Journal of Engineering and Technology Re-search. 2017; 2(11):28-34.
36.
Azad S, Riasi A, Mahmoodi Darian H, Amiri Moghadam H. Par-ametric study of a viscoelastic RANS turbulence model in the fully developed channel flow. Journal of Computational Applied Me-chanics. 2017;48(1):65-74.
38.
Versteeg HK. An introduction to computational fluid dynamics the finite volume method 2/E. Pearson Education India; 2007.
39.
Yin J, Teodosiu C. Constrained mesh optimization on boundary. Engineering with Computers. 2008;24(3):231-240.
40.
Katz A, Sankaran V. Mesh quality effects on the accuracy of CFD solutions on unstructured meshes. Journal of Computa-tional Physics. 2011;230(20):7670-7686.
41.
Ramos MC, Costa AL, Silva VVA, Lima CPB, Veloso MAF. Nu-merical simulation and validation of laminar flow through a 2D pipe using computational fluid dynamics. Brazilian Journal of De-velopment. 2023;9(10):28793-28807.
42.
Kherief Nacereddine AH, Kholai O, Chekired M, Kadja M, Mai TH. Numerical Simulation of Laminar Flow of a Non-Newtonian Ben-tonite Solution in a Horizontal Pipe. Journal of Computa-tional Applied Mechanics. 2024;55(4):552-566.
43.
Niazkar M. Discussion of “Accurate and Efficient Explicit Approx-imations of the Colebrook Flow Friction Equation Based on the Wright ω-Function” by Dejan Brkić and Pavel Praks. Mathemat-ics. 2020; 8(5):793.
| eISSN: | 2300-5319 |
| ISSN: | 1898-4088 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
