RESEARCH PAPER
Fully Automatic Simulation of Crack Propagation in Plane Structures
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Architecture and Construction, IU International University of Applied Sciences, Rosa-Luxemburg-Straße 27, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
 
2
Institute of Materials Engineering, Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg, Gustav-Zeuner-Str. 5, 09599 Freiberg, Germany
 
3
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Applied Sciences Zittau/Görlitz, PF 1454, Schwenninger Weg 1, 02754 Zittau, Germany
 
 
Publication date: 2026-03-24
 
 
Acta Mechanica et Automatica 2026;20(1):235-241
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
In this paper, advanced fully automatic computations of curved crack propagation in combination with the analysis of the plastic limit loading by the lower bound theorem of plasticity in plane structures with multiple cracks are presented. For this purpose a simulation program based on the finite element method (FEM) is developed. A Coffin-Manson-model is implemented to include ad-ditionally initiated cracks into the model during the crack growth simulation process. To show the accuracy of the simulation pro-gram numerical results of multiple crack growth under proportional loading configurations are presented and compared with exper-imental data. The results indicate that the proposed solution algorithm provides a powerful tool for flaw assessment with the failure assessment diagram (FAD) procedure in combination with a numerical crack path simulation. Furthermore, it can be observed that local plastic failure occurs in the liga-ment between two approaching crack tips, which does not lead immediately to a complete loss of load-bearing capacity of the damaged structure.
REFERENCES (22)
1.
Aliabadi M, Wrobel L. The boundary element method, applica-tions in solids and structures. John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2002.
 
2.
Belytschko T, Krongauz Y, Organ D, Fleming M, Krysl P, Mesh-less methods: An overview and recent developments, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 1996;139(1-4):3-47.
 
3.
Belytschko T, Black T. Elastic crack growth in finite elements with minimal remeshing, International Journal of Numerical Methods in Engineering. 1999;45:601-620.
 
4.
Bergkvist H, Gnex L. Curved crack propagation. International Journal of Fracture. 1979;15:429-441.
 
5.
Boller C, Seeger T, Vormwald M, Materials Database for Cyclic Loading. Department Materials mechanics. TU Darmstadt; 2008.
 
6.
Buchholz F, Wiebesiek J, Fulland M, Richard H Comparison of Computational Crack Path Predictions with Experimental Findings for a Quarter-Circular Surface Crack in a Shaft under Torsion. Key Engineering Materials. 2007; 348 349:161-164.
 
7.
Colombo D, Giglio M. A methodology for automatic crack propa-gation modelling in planar and shell FE models. Engineering Fracture Mechanics. 2006;73(4):490-504.
 
8.
Dhondt G. Application of the Finite Element Method to mixed-mode cyclic crack propagation calculations in specimens. Interna-tional Journal of Fatigue. 2014;58:2-11.
 
9.
Fracture Mechanics Proof of Strength for Engineering Compo-nents. 4rd Edition. FKM 2018. (in German).
 
10.
Goldstein RV, Salganik RL. Brittle fracture of solids with arbitrary cracks. International Journal of Fracture. 1974;10:507-523.
 
11.
Henkel S, Holländer D, Wünsche M, Theilig H, Hübner P, Bier-mann H, Mehringer S. Methods for crack observation and simula-tion of curved fatigue crack growth and their usage. Engineering Fracture Mechanics. 2010;77:2077-2090.
 
12.
Judt P, Ricoeur A. Crack growth simulation of multiple cracks systems applying remote contour interaction integrals. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics. 2015;75:78-88.
 
13.
Meyer A, Rabold F, Scherzer M. Efficient finite element simulation of crack propagation using adaptive iterative solvers. Communi-cations in Numerical Methods in Engineering. 2006;22(2):93-108.
 
14.
Moes N, Dolbow J, Belytschko T. A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing, International Journal of Numeri-cal Methods in Engineering. 1999;46:131-150.
 
15.
Oldersma A, Wanhill R. Variability of Fatigue Crack Growth Prop-erties for 2024-T3 Aluminium Alloy/ DTIC Document; 1996 - Re-search report.
 
16.
Ricoeur A, Judt P, Piffer B. A new type of flat-bar specimen for non-proportional mixed-mode crack tip loading under uniaxial tension, Engineering Fracture Mechanics. 2019;209:382-391.
 
17.
Sumi Y. Computational crack path prediction. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics. 1985;4:149-156.
 
18.
Sumi Y. Fracture morphology and its evolution. A review on crack path stability and brittle fracture along butt-weld. Frattura ed In-tegrità Strutturale. 2015;34:42-58.
 
19.
Theilig H, Wünsche M, Bergmann R. Numerical and experimental investigation of curved fatigue crack growth under proportional cyclic loading, steel research. 2003;74:566-576.
 
20.
Williams RC, Phan A-V, Tippur HV, Kaplan T, Gray LJ. SGBEM analysis of crack-particle(s) interactions due to elastic constants mismatch, Engineering Fracture Mechanics. 2007;74:314-331.
 
21.
Zerres P, Brüning J, Vormwald M. Fatigue crack growth behavior of fine-grained steel S460N under proportional and non-proportional loading. Engineering Fracture Mechanics. 2010;77:1822-34.
 
22.
Zhang X, Ma Y, Yang M, Zhou C, Fu N, Huang W, Wang Z. A review of in-plane biaxial fatigue behavior of metallic materials. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics. 2023;123:103726.
 
eISSN:2300-5319
ISSN:1898-4088
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top