RESEARCH PAPER
Using Computer Technique for Developing Method for Vibration Damage Estimation Under Combined Random and Deterministic Loading
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Machine Design and Research, Wroclaw University of Technology and Science, ul. Ignacego Łukasiewicza 7/9, 50-371 , Wrocław, Poland
Submission date: 2023-03-23
Acceptance date: 2023-06-16
Online publication date: 2023-12-30
Publication date: 2023-12-01
Acta Mechanica et Automatica 2023;17(4):558-569
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
This paper is focusses on developing a novel method for vibration damage estimation for military helicopters, fighter aircrafts and any other aircraft exposed to combined stochastic and deterministic loading. The first stage of the research focused on frequency domain damage prediction, which is the legacy method proposed by Bishop and developed by Sweitzer, Schlesinger, Woodward, Kerr, Murthy, Datta and, Atkins. The mentioned frequency domain-based method is used in commercial software, e.g., MSC CAE Fatigue. Frequency domain damage prediction is based on superposition of spectral moments and Dirlik method of Rainflow Cycle Counting algorithm in frequency domain. The first phase of the research showed the legacy algorithm based on transfer function developed using FEM (Finite Element Method) method in Abaqus environment and is very conservative. The second stage of the research aims to develop a novel method which allowing for more robust and accurate damage estimation. For this purpose, the Monte Carlo method for retrieving random signal in the time domain from signal in frequency domain was used. To obtain the system transfer function, – the 1 g load harmonic system response was obtained using FEM analysis. It was subsequently scaled linearly by the PSD input curve for random loading and sine wave, or sine sweep function for deterministic loading to calculate the cumulative system response of the linear system. The research allows the development of a novel method to precisely estimate vibration damage using combined time and frequency domains approach, based on effective frequency domain FEM analysis of the linear system. The new proposed method can be also used for precise replication of test conditions via considering signal clipping and frequency resolution used for real testing.
REFERENCES (52)
2.
Bendat J. Random data: Analysis and measurement procedures. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York United States 2010.
3.
Bendat J. Principles and Applications of Random Noise Theory. John Wiley, New York,1958.
4.
Rice S. Mathematical analysis of random noise. Selected papers on noise and stochastic processes, Dover, New York, 1954.
6.
CAEfatigue VIBRATION (CFV) User Guide & Verification Manual (Release 2020). CAEfatigue Limited, UK, Nov 2020.
7.
nCode 2022.0 documentation, HBK 2022.
8.
Lalanne C. Mechanical vibration and shock, Vol. 4, Hermes Penton Science, London, 2009.
9.
Lalanne C. Mechanical vibration and shock analysis: Specification Development, 3rd edition, Vol. 5, Wiley, London, 2014.
10.
Lalanne C. Mechanical vibration and shock analysis: Fatigue Damage, 3rd edition, Vol. 4, Wiley, London, 2014.
11.
Steinberg D. Vibration analysis for electronic equipment (2nd edition). Jon Wiley & Sons, New York, 1988.
12.
Halfpenny A, Kichim F. Rainflow cycle counting and acoustic fatigue analysis technique for random loading. 10th International Conference RASD, Southampton UK, 2010. Available from:.
14.
Halfpenny A. Rainflow Cycle Counting and Fatigue Analysis from PSD, Proceedings of the ASTELAB conference, France, 2007. Available from:
https://core.ac.uk/download/pd....
15.
Halfpenny A, Bishop N. Vibration Fatigue, HBM-nCode, UK, 1997.
16.
Sweitzer K., Bishop N, Genberg V. Efficient computation of spectral moments for determination of random response statistics. International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering - ISMA, Leuven, BE, 2004. Available from:
https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/....
18.
Bishop N. Methods for the rapid evaluation of fatigue damage on the Howden HWP330 wind turbine. Proceedings of 13th British Wind Energy Conference, Swansea, UK, p. 317-321, 1991.
19.
Bishop N, Sweitzer K, Schlesinger D, Woodward A. Fatigue calculation for multi input random and deterministic loads in the frequency domain. UK NAFEMS Conference, Oxford IK, Accelerating the Future of CAE, 10-11 June 2014.
20.
Bishop N, Kerr S, Murthy P, Sweitzer K. Advances Relating to Fatigue Calculations for Combined Random and Deterministic Loads. SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-0725, 2014
https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-0....
21.
Bishop N, Murthy P, Sweitzer K. Advances Relating to Fatigue Calculation for Combined Random and Deterministic Loads. 13th International ASTM/ESIS Symposium on Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics (39th National Symposium on Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics), November 13-15, 2013, Jacksonville, FL
https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-0....
22.
Bishop N, Murthy P, Sweitzer K., Kerr S. Time vs frequency domain analysis for large automotive systems. SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-0535, 2015.
https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-0....
23.
Bishop N, Murthy P, Sweitzer K., Kerr S. Time vs frequency domain analysis for large automotive systems. SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-0535, 2015, doi:
https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-0....
24.
Ferreira W, Meehan T, Cardoso V, Bishop N. A comparative study of automotive system fatigue models processed in the time and frequency domain. SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-0377, 2016,
https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-0....
25.
Datta S, Bishop N, Sweitzer K, Atkins A. Simultaneous durability assessment and relative random analysis under base shake loading conditions. SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-0339, 2017.
27.
MIL-STD-810H, Department of Defence Test Method Standard: Environmental Engineering Consideration and Laboratory Test, USA, 2019.
28.
Brown AM, McGhee DS. Statistical Evaluation and Improvement of Method for Combining Random and Harmonic Loads. Marshall Space Flight Centre, Alabama 35812, 2003. Available from:
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citation....
29.
Ptak M, Czmochowski J. Using computer techniques for vibration damage estimation under stochastic loading using the Monte Carlo Method for aerospace applications. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics. 2023, vol. 72, p. 1-13.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prob....
30.
Ptak M, Czmochowski J. Using computer techniques for vibration damage estimation of aircraft structures under stochastic loading. W: Computer Aided Engineering. Nauka i przemysł / red. Tadeusz Smolnicki. Wrocław : Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej, 2022. p. 169-179. ISBN: 978-83-7493-223-3.
31.
Metallic Materials Properties Development and Standardization (MMPDS-15), Battelle Memorial Institute, July 2020.
32.
Delprete C, Sesana R, Vercelli A. Multiaxial damage assessment and life estimation: application to an automotive exhaust manifold. Procedia Engineering Vol. 2, April 2010, p. 725-734. Available from: doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2010.03.078.
33.
Engin Z., Coker D. Comparison of Equivalent Stress Method with Critical Plane Approaches for Multiaxial High Cycle Fatigue Assessment. 2nd International Conference on Structural Integrity, ICSI 2017, 4-7 September 2017, Funchal, Madeira, Portugal. Procedia Structural Integrity Vol. 5 2017, p. 1229-1236. Available from: doi: 10.1016/j.prostr.2017.07.049.
34.
Smolnicki M, Ptak M, Lesiuk G. Static failure load predictions in notched steel components using a combined experimental-numerical approach. International Journal of Structural Integrity. 2017, vol. 8, no. 6, p. 683-693.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSI-0....
36.
Kucharski P, Lesiuk G, Czapliński T, Fratczak R, Maciejewski Ł. Numerical Estimation of Stress Intensity Factors and Crack Propagation in Lug Connector with Existing Flaw. AIP Conference Proceedings. Fatigue Failure and Fracture Mechanics XXVI: Proceedings of the XXVI Polish National Conference on Fatigue Failure and Fracture Mechanics 17-20 May 2016 Fojutowo, Poland.
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4965....
37.
Miner A. Cumulative damage in fatigue. J Applied Mechanics, Vol. 67, 1945, pp A159-A164, 1945.
38.
Palmgren A. Die lebensdauer von kugellagern, zeitschrift des vereinesdeutscher ingenierure, Vol. 68, No. 14, 1924, pp. 339-341, 1924.
39.
Zienkiewicz O.C. Finite Element Method. McGraw-Hill, Dallas (1977).
40.
ABAQUS User Manual V2018. Dassault Systems (2017).
41.
Ptak M, Czmochowski J. Analysis of the impact of dynamic loads on transmission shafts of a civil aircraft. Modelling in engineering 2020: applied mechanics, Springer 2021. p. 245-257. Available from: doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-68455-6_22.
42.
Newland D. An introduction to random vibrations, spectral & wavelet analysis. Longman Inc., England 1995.
43.
Langtangen H. Python Scripting for Computational Science, Third Edition, Simula Research Laboratory. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009.
46.
ESDU 06010 Cycle counting methods for the estimation on fatigue life.
47.
Matsuishi M, Endo T. Fatigue of metals subject to varying stress. Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Fukuoka, March 1968.
48.
Downing S, Socie D. Simple Rainflow counting algorithms. International Journal of Fatigue, January 1982.
49.
Watson P, Dabell B. Cycle counting and fatigue damage. Society of Environmental Engineers, September 1976.
51.
Meggiolaro MA, Castro JTP. Statistical evaluation of strain-life fatigue crack initiation predictions. International Journal of Fatigue, Vol 26, Issue 5, May 2004, p. 463-476. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2003.10.003.
52.
Lee YL, Hathaway R, Barkey M. Fatigue Testing and Analysis. Theory and Practice. Elsevier Butterworth Heinemann, 1st Edition July 29, 2004.