Comparative Analysis of YOLOv8x and YOLOv11x Models for Rotary Tedder Faults Detection
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Computer Science and Technology, University of Lomza, Poland
2
Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Bialystok University of Technology, Poland
Publication date: 2026-03-11
Acta Mechanica et Automatica 2026;20(1)
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
This article presents a study on applying artificial intelligence, specifically YOLOv8x and YOLOv11x (You Only Look Once) models, for detecting three types of faults (healthy, broken, and missing teeth) in rotary tedders under data-constrained conditions. We trained both models on three progressively augmented datasets (V1-V3) derived from limited video footage, applying rotations, color alterations and filtering to simulate variance. Our results show a clear correlation between data volume/quality and model per-formance: mean Average Precision (mAP0.5) improved from 62–67% (Dataset V1) to 82–85% (Dataset V3). While YOLOv11x achieved marginally better overall accuracy (85% vs. 82%), both architectures struggled with background confusion, particularly for the "healthy tooth" class. This work demonstrates that with strategic data augmentation, off-the-shelf YOLO models can achieve promising detection accuracy even with limited initial data, providing a practical baseline for real-time agricultural fault monitoring systems.
REFERENCES (20)
1.
Mystkowski A, Wolniakowski A, Idzkowski A, Ciężkowski M, Ostaszewski M, Kociszewski R, et al. Measurement and diagnos-tic system for detecting and classifying faults in the rotary hay tedder using multilayer perceptron neural networks. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 2024. Available from:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enga....
2.
Sewioło M, Mystkowski A, Berghout T, Khamari D, Wolszczak P, Litak G. Fault detection in rotary agricultural machinery using ge-netic algorithm optimized multiple input – parallel – convolutional neural networks. 2023 International Conference on Electrical En-gineering and Advanced Technology (ICEEAT). 2023;1–6. Available from:
https://doi.org/10.1109/iceeat....
3.
Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE. ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. Neural Information Processing Systems; 2012. Available from:
http://books.nips.cc/papers/fi... nips25/NIPS2012_0534.pdf.
4.
Sharma N, Jain V, Mishra A. An analysis of convolutional neural networks for image classification. Procedia Computer Science. 2018. Available from:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proc....
5.
Tensmeyer C, Martinez T. Analysis of Convolutional Neural Net-works for Document Image Classification. 2017 14th IAPR Inter-national Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR) . 2017. Available from:
https://doi.org/10.1109/icdar.....
6.
Liu W, Anguelov D, Erhan D, Szegedy C, Reed S, Fu CY et al. SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detector. In: Lecture notes in com-puter science. 2016; 21–37.
8.
Yao J, Song B, Chen X, Zhang M, Dong X, Liu H, et al. Pine-YOLO: a method for detecting pine wilt disease in unmanned aerial vehicle remote sensing images. Forests. 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCC65...
9.
Tarasiuk K., Mystkowski A., Ostaszewski M., Majka A., Czarni-gowski J., Performance Comparison of YOLO Setups for Agricul-ture Machine Surrounding Monitoring, 26th International Carpa-thian Control Conference (ICCC). Starý Smokovec, Słowacja. 19-21.05.2025.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCC65....
10.
Sharma A, Kumar V, Longchamps L. Comparative performance of YOLOv8, YOLOv9, YOLOv10, YOLOv11 and Faster R-CNN models for detection of multiple weed species. Smart Agricultural Technology; 2024. Available from:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atec....
11.
Han B, Zhang J, Almodfer R, Wang Y, Sun W, Bai T, et al. Re-search on innovative Apple Grading technology driven by intelli-gent vision and machine learning. Foods. 2025. Available from:
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods1....
13.
Hidayatullah P, Syakrani N, Sholahuddin M, Gelar T, Tubagus R. YOLOv8 to YOLO11: A Comprehensive Architecture In-depth Comparative Review. ArXiv abs/2501.13400. 2025. Available from:
https://api.semanticscholar.or....
18.
Boufares O, Boussif M, Saadaoui W, Miraoui I. Moving object detection: a new method combining background subtraction, fuzzy entropy thresholding and differential evolution optimization. Acta Mechanica et Automatica. 2025;19(1):106–16. Available from:
https://doi.org/10.2478/ama-20...
19.
Niyongabo J, Zhang Y, Ndikumagenge J. Bearing fault detection and diagnosis based on densely connected convolutional net-works. Acta Mechanica Et Automatica. 2022;16(2):130–5. Available from:
https://doi.org/10.2478/ama-20....
20.
Powroznik P, Skublewska-Paszkowska M, Rejdak R, Nowomiejska K. Automatic Method of macular Diseases detection using deep CNN-GRU network in OCT images. Acta Mechanica Et Automatica. 2024;18(4):197–206. Available from:
https://doi.org/10.2478/ama-20....