RESEARCH PAPER
Comparative Study of Wear Resistance of the Composite with Microhybrid Structure and Nanocomposite
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Applied Mechanics, Main School of Fire Services, 52/54 J. Słowackiego St., 01-629 Warszawa, Poland
 
2
Department of Conservative Dentistry with Endodontics, Medical University of Lublin, 7 Karmelicka St., 20-081 Lublin, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2015-07-25
 
 
Acceptance date: 2016-12-09
 
 
Online publication date: 2016-12-28
 
 
Publication date: 2016-12-01
 
 
Acta Mechanica et Automatica 2016;10(4):306-309
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The aim of the study was to compare microhardness and wear resistance of ceramic-polymer composites with micro and nano-hybrid structure. For the studies commercial composites were used, containing filler particles of the same type but different sizes, nano-sized (Filtek Ultimate) and micro-sized (Filtek Z250) composites. Tribological testing was conducted using ball-on-disc micro-tribometer. Vickers testing method was applied for microhardness studies with the use of Futertech FM 700 device. It has been demonstrated that the wear of Filtek Ultimate is almost twice lower in comparison to wear of Filtek Z250 composite. It has been concluded that the use of filler nanoparticles significantly increased wear resistance of the material. Additionally, lack of correlation between material microhardness and wear resistance has been demonstrated.
REFERENCES (20)
1.
Canche-Escamilla G., Duarte-Aranda S., Toledano M. (2014), Synthesis and characterization of hybrid silica/PMMA nanoparticles and their use as filler in dental composites, Materials Science and Engineering C: Materials for Biological Applications, 42, 161-167.
 
2.
Ferracane J.L., Palin W.M. (2013), Effects of particulate filler systems on the properties and performance of dental polymer composites, in Vallittu P. editor, Non-Metallic Biomaterials for Tooth Repair and Replacement, Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge.
 
3.
Finlay N., Hahnel S., Dowling A.H., Fleming G.J.P. (2013), The in vitro wear behavior of experimental resin-based composites derived from a commercial formulation, Dental Matererials, 29, 365–374.
 
4.
Hambire U.V., Tripathi V.K. (2013), Optimization of compressive strength in Zirconia nanoclusters of the Bis-GMA and TEGDMA based dental composites, Procedia Engineering, 51, 494–500.
 
5.
Heintze S.D., Zappini G., Rousson V. (2005), Wear of ten dental restorative materials in five wear simulators—Results of a round robin test, Dental Materials, 21, 304-317.
 
6.
Kleczewska J., Bieliński D.M. (2007), Friction and wear of resin-based dental materials, Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 4, 87-96.
 
7.
Lambrecht P., Debels E., Van Landuyt K., Peumans M., Van Meerbeek B. (2006), How to simulate wear? Overview of existing methods, Dental Materials, 22, 693–701.
 
8.
Mair L.H. (2000), Wear in the mouth: the tribological dimension, in Addy M., et al., editors, Tooth wear and sensitivity. Clinical advances in restorative dentistry, Martin Dunitz Ltd., London.
 
9.
Mair L.H., Stolarski T.A., Vowles R.W. Lloyd C.H. (1996), Wear: mechanisms, manifestations and measurement. Report of a workshop, Journal of Dentistry, 24, 141-148.
 
10.
Palaniappan S., Celis J.P., Meerbeek B., Peumans M., Lambrechts P. (2013), Correlating in vitro scratch test with in vivo contact free occlusal area wear of contemporary dental composites, Dental Materials, 29, 259–268.
 
11.
Palaniappan S., Peumans M., van Meerbeek B., Lambrechts P. (2013), Wear prediction in dental composites in Yan Y. editor, Bio-Tribocorrosion in Biomaterials and Medical Implants, Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge.
 
12.
Ramalho A., Antunes P.V. (2005), Reciprocating wear test of dental composites: effect on the antagonist. Wear, 259, 1005–1011.
 
13.
Schmalz G. (2009), Resin-Based Composites in Schmalz G. and Arenholt-Bindslev D. editors, Biocompatibility of Dental Materials, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.
 
14.
Souza J.C.M., Bentes A.C., Reis K., Gavinha S., Buciumeanu M., Henriques B., Silva F., Gomes J.R. (2016), Abrasive and sliding wear of resin composites for dental restorations, Tribology International 102, 154-160.
 
15.
Thomaidis S., Kakaboura A., Mueller W.D., Zinelis S. (2013), Mechanical properties of contemporary composite resins and their interrelations, Dental Materials, 29, 132-141.
 
16.
Turssi C.P. Ferracane J.L., Vogel K. (2005), Filler features and their effects on wear and degree of conversion of particulate dental resin composites, Biomaterials, 26, 4932-4937.
 
17.
Turssi C.P., Faraoni-Romano J.J., Menezes M., Serra M.C. (2007), Comparative study of the wear behavior of composites for posterior restorations, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 18, 143-147.
 
18.
Wang L., D’Alpino P.H., Lopes L., Pereira J. (2003), Mechanical properties of dental restorative materials: relative contribution of laboratory tests, Journal of Applied Oral Science, 11, 162–7.
 
19.
Wang R., Bao S., Liu F., Jiang X., Zhang Q., Sun B., Zhu M. (2013), Wear behavior of light-cured resin composites with bimodal silica nanostructures as fillers, Materials Science and Engineering C: Materials for Biological Applications, 33, 4759–4766.
 
20.
Wang R., Zhang M., Liu F., Bao S., Wu T., Jiang X., Zhang Q., Zhu M. (2015), Investigation on the physical-mechanical properties of dental resin composites reinforced with novel bimodal silica nanostructures, Materials Science and Engineering C: Materials for Biological Applications, 50, 266-273.
 
eISSN:2300-5319
ISSN:1898-4088
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top