Dimensional Accuracy of Photo-Curing (LCD) Microprinting
 
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics, Department of Manufacturing Systems, AGH University of Krakow, A. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland
 
2
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, ul. Piotrowo 3, 60-965 Poznan, Poland
 
 
Publication date: 2026-03-11
 
 
Acta Mechanica et Automatica 2026;20(1)
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The study investigates the dimensional accuracy of photo-curing (LCD – liquid crystal display) microprinting, as well as the geometries possible to obtain in a repeatable manner through the before mentioned method. LCD technologies rely on the photopolymerization effect induced by UV light patterns projected through a liquid crystal screen. This method is known for its capability of producing high-quality surface finish and fine details (in comparison to material extrusion 3d printing methods). Quality of the part can be influenced by various factors, including the screen resolution and pixel size, light intensity distribution, resin composition, its type, its properties and exposition time, to name a few. To comprehensively understand these effects, authors conducted a series of experiments, to quantify the dimensional deviations and amount of geometrical defects in comparison to intended designs (the model). Various geometric shapes with critical dimensions ranging from tens to hundreds of micrometers were printed using different manufacturing settings. The results were analyzed to identify the primary contributors to dimensional deviations and to assess the limitations of the process. Our findings reveal that high levels of precision with very fine structures (approximately 30-40 micrometers in the smallest dimension) can be achieved, but proper resin selection, as well as processing parameters, including digital model preparation, have to be picked. The study provides insight into photo-curing LCD microprinting, expanding its applicability in precision engineering and microdevice fabrication.
REFERENCES (33)
1.
ELEGOO Mars 4 Ultra 9K Resin 3D Printer [Internet]. ELEGOO Official. [cited 2024 Aug 20]. Available from: https://www.elegoo.com/product....
 
2.
ELEGOO Saturn 4 Ultra 12K - Best Resin Fast 3D Printer 2024 [Internet]. ELEGOO EU. [cited 2024 Aug 20]. Available from: https://eu.elegoo.com/en-pl/pr....
 
3.
Anycubic 3D Printer | For Freedom to Make [Internet]. Available from: https://www.anycubic.com/en/ph....
 
4.
Huang C. Micro2 [Internet]. microSLA. Available from: https://www.microsla.com/micro....
 
5.
Xiao Y, Li J, Song Z, Liao J, Shen M, Yu T, et al. 3D Printable Materials with Visible Light Triggered Photochromism and Room Temperature Phosphorescence. J Am Chem Soc. 2025;147(24):20372–80.
 
6.
Sun H, Xiao Y, He Y, Wei X, Zou J, Luo Y, et al. 3D printable organic room-temperature phosphorescent materials and printed real-time sensing and display devices. Chem Sci. 2025;16(12):5299–309.
 
7.
Huang R, He Y, Wang J, Zou J, Wang H, Sun H, et al. Tunable afterglow for mechanical self-monitoring 3D printing structures. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):1596.
 
8.
Gholami F, Yue L, Li M, Jain A, Mahmood A, Fratarcangeli M, et al. Fast and Efficient Fabrication of Functional Electronic Devices through Grayscale Digital Light Processing 3D Printing. Ad-vanced Materials. 2024;36(46):2408774.
 
9.
Kong S, Wang H, Liao J, Xiao Y, Yu T, Huang W. Intrinsic Nar-rowband Blue Phosphorescent Materials and Their Applications in 3D Printed Self‐monitoring Microfluidic Chips. Advanced Mate-rials. 2024;36(49):2412468.
 
10.
Cecil J, Bharathi Raj Kumar MB, Lu Y, Basallali V. A review of micro-devices assembly techniques and technology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2016;83(9):1569–81.
 
11.
Rackus DG, Shamsi MH, Wheeler AR. Electrochemistry, biosen-sors and microfluidics: a convergence of fields. Chem Soc Rev. 2015;44(15):5320–40.
 
12.
A. Gurkan U, K. Wood D, Carranza D, H. Herbertson L, L. Dia-mond S, Du E, et al. Next generation microfluidics: fulfilling the promise of lab-on-a-chip technologies. Lab on a Chip. 2024;24(7):1867–74.
 
13.
Nguyen NT, Wereley ST, Shaegh SAM. Fundamentals and applications of microfluidics. Third edition. Norwood., MA: Artech House; 2019.
 
14.
Zhang H, Yang J, Sun R, Han S, Yang Z, Teng L. Microfluidics for nano-drug delivery systems: From fundamentals to industriali-zation. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B. 2023;13(8):3277–99.
 
15.
Alam MdK. Nanocarrier‐Based Drug Delivery Systems using Microfluidic‐Assisted Techniques. Advanced NanoBiomed Re-search. 2023;3(11):2300041.
 
16.
Alavi SE, Alharthi S, Alavi SF, Alavi SZ, Zahra GE, Raza A, et al. Microfluidics for personalized drug delivery. Drug Discovery To-day. 2024;29(4):103936.
 
17.
Han X, Tan S, Wang Q, Zuo X, Heng L, Jiang L. Noncontact Microfluidics of Highly Viscous Liquids for Accurate Self-Splitting and Pipetting. Advanced Materials. 2024;36(27):2402779.
 
18.
Razavi Z, Soltani M, Pazoki-Toroudi H, Chen P. CRISPR-microfluidics nexus: Advancing biomedical applications for under-standing and detection. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical. 2024;376:115625.
 
19.
Gong H, Woolley AT, Nordin GP. High density 3D printed micro-fluidic valves, pumps, and multiplexers. Lab Chip. 2016;16(13):2450–8.
 
20.
Ahmed I, Sullivan K, Priye A. Multi-Resin Masked Stereolithogra-phy (MSLA) 3D Printing for Rapid and Inexpensive Prototyping of Microfluidic Chips with Integrated Functional Components. Bio-sensors. 2022;12(8):652.
 
21.
Safarkhani M, Farasati Far B, Lima EC, Jafarzadeh S, Makvandi P, Varma RS, et al. Integration of MXene and Microfluidics: A Perspective. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2024;10(2):657–76.
 
22.
Beebe DJ, Mensing GA, Walker GM. Physics and Applications of Microfluidics in Biology. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2002;4(1):261–86.
 
23.
Yap HK, Ng HY, Yeow CH. High-Force Soft Printable Pneumatics for Soft Robotic Applications. Soft Robotics. 2016;3(3):144-58.
 
24.
Quero RF, Costa BM de C, da Silva JAF, de Jesus DP. Using multi-material fused deposition modeling (FDM) for one-step 3D printing of microfluidic capillary electrophoresis with integrated electrodes for capacitively coupled contactless conductivity de-tection. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 2022;365:131959.
 
25.
Wallin TJ, Pikul J, Shepherd RF. 3D printing of soft robotic sys-tems. Nat Rev Mater. 2018;3(6):84–100.
 
26.
Tang W, Liu H, Zhu L, Shi J, Li Z, Xiang N, et al. Fabrication of Different Microchannels by Adjusting the Extrusion Parameters for Sacrificial Molds. Micromachines. 2019;10(8):544.
 
27.
Xie M, Zhan Z, Li Y, Zhao J, Zhang C, Wang Z, et al. Functional microfluidics: theory, microfabrication, and applications. Int J Ex-trem Manuf. 2024;6(3):032005.
 
28.
Yin Q, Guo Q, Wang Z, Chen Y, Duan H, Cheng P. 3D-Printed Bioinspired Cassie–Baxter Wettability for Controllable Micro-droplet Manipulation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13(1):1979–87.
 
29.
Nan L, Zhang H, Weitz DA, Shum HC. Development and future of droplet microfluidics. Lab Chip. 2024;24(5):1135–53.
 
30.
Wang W, Yang C, Li CM. On-demand microfluidic droplet trapping and fusion for on-chip static droplet assays. Lab Chip. 2009;9(11):1504–6.
 
31.
Han SH, Choi Y, Kim J, Lee D. Photoactivated Selective Release of Droplets from Microwell Arrays. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12(3):3936–44.
 
32.
Yandrapalli N, Petit J, Bäumchen O, Robinson T. Surfactant-free production of biomimetic giant unilamellar vesicles using PDMS-based microfluidics. Commun Chem. 2021;4(1):1–10.
 
33.
Tang T, Yuan Y, Yalikun Y, Hosokawa Y, Li M, Tanaka Y. Glass based micro total analysis systems: Materials, fabrication meth-ods, and applications. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 2021;339:129859.
 
eISSN:2300-5319
ISSN:1898-4088
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top