RESEARCH PAPER
Modeling the Impact of Surface Roughness on the Elastic Properties of Thin Films
 
More details
Hide details
1
Institute of Mechanical Engineering, University of Zielona Gora, Poland
 
2
Faculty of Mechanics and Mathematics, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Ukraine
 
These authors had equal contribution to this work
 
 
Submission date: 2026-02-24
 
 
Final revision date: 2026-04-02
 
 
Acceptance date: 2026-04-11
 
 
Publication date: 2026-06-05
 
 
Corresponding author
Kostiantyn TCHERVINKA   

Faculty of Mechanics and Mathematics, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Universytetska, 79000, Lviv, Ukraine
 
 
Acta Mechanica et Automatica 2026;20(2):380-388
 
HIGHLIGHTS
  • Non-uniform density requires accounting for the non-uniform elastic properties
  • The parameters of mass sources significantly influence the effective elastic moduli
  • The effective elastic moduli of thin films exhibit a pronounced size effect
  • The proposed model describes the peculiarities of the material ratio curve
  • The effective elastic moduli of thin films depend on surface roughness
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The governing system of equations for the model of a locally inhomogeneous elastic body is based on constitutive equations generalized to account for local inhomogeneity of the binding energy and includes an equation for the mass density in the form of an inhomogeneous Helmholtz equation. This paper shows that, by selecting appropriate mass sources (the inhomogeneous term in the mass density equation), it is possible to obtain a mass density distribution in the near-surface region that reflects the characteristics of the Abbott–Firestone curve, which is widely used in engineering practice to describe surface roughness. Using a flat surface as an example, the influence of the model parameters on the core, peak, and valley zones of the material ratio curve is investigated. When modeling the influence of the surface roughness parameters of a real body on the effective elastic moduli of thin films, it is assumed that the local Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio are functions of the mass density. The solution to the problem for a stretched layer is expressed in quadratures, and its analysis is performed using numerical methods. In particular, it is shown that the characteristic length scales of the size effects of the effective elastic moduli depend on the structural heterogeneity of the material and on the sizes of the core, peak, and valley zones of the roughness profile
REFERENCES (27)
1.
Abadias G, Chason E, Keckes J, Sebastiani M, Thompson GB, Barthel E, Martinu L. Review Article: Stress in thin films and coatings: current status, challenges, and prospects. J Vac Sci Technol A. 2018;36(2): 020801. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.5011....
 
2.
Bull SJ, Chalker PR, Johnston C, Moore V. The effect of roughness on the friction and wear of diamond thin films. Surf Coat Technol. 1994; 68:603–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/0257-8....
 
3.
Elanjeitsenni VP, Vadivu KS, Prasanth BM. A review on thin films, conducting polymers as sensor devices. Mater Res Express. 2022;9(2):022001. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1....
 
4.
Pang X, Zhang L, Yang H, Gao K, Volinsky AA. Residual stress and surface energy of sputtered TiN films. J Mater Eng Perform. 2015;24:1185–1191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665....
 
5.
Fahs A, Mi S, Nicolazzi W, Molnár G, Bousseksou A. Disentangling surface energy and surface/interface stress effects in spin crossover nanomaterials. Adv Phys Res. 2023;2(10):2200055.https://doi.org/10.1002/ apxr.202200055.
 
6.
Goudarzi T., Avazmohammadi R, Naghdabadi R. Surface energy effects on the yield strength of nanoporous materials containing na-noscale cylindrical voids. Mech Mater. 2010;42(9):852-862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mech....
 
7.
Ling FF, Lai WM, Lucca DA. Fundamentals of Surface Mechanics. New York: Springer; 2002. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-....
 
8.
Nasr Esfahani M, Jabbari M. Influence of the surface stress on the size-dependent elastic behavior of silicon nanowires. J Appl Phys. 2020;127(19):195106. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0006....
 
9.
Povstenko Y. Mathematical modeling of phenomena caused by surface stresses in solids. In: Altenbach H, Morozov N, editors. Surface Ef-fects in Solid Mechanics. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. Adv Struc Mater. 2013; 30. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
 
10.
Johnson KL. Contact Mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1985. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978....
 
11.
Kragelsky IV, Demkin NB. Contact area of rough surfaces. Wear. 1960;3(3):170–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1....
 
12.
Sedlaček M, Podgornik B, Vižintin J. Correlation between standard roughness parameters skewness and kurtosis and tribological behaviour of contact surfaces. Tribol Int. 2012;48:102–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trib....
 
13.
Zhu S, Huang P. Influence mechanism of morphological parameters on tribological behaviors based on bearing ratio curve. Tribol Int. 2017;109:10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trib....
 
14.
Nahirnyj T, Tchervinka K. Mathematical modeling of structural and nearsurface non-homogeneities in thermoelastic thin films. Int J Eng Sci. 2015;91:49–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijen....
 
15.
Nahirnyj T, Tchervinka K. Functional kinetic equations in mathematical modeling of coupled processes in solids. Contin Mech Thermodyn. 2020;32:1727–1743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00161....
 
16.
Nahirnyj T, Tchervinka K. Mathematical modeling of the coupled pro-cesses in nanoporous bodies. Acta Mech Autom. 2018;12(3):196–203. https://doi.org/10.2478/ama-20....
 
17.
Nahirnyj T, Sąsiadek M, Tchervinka K. Modeling the effect of surface roughness on mechanical fields in an elastic solid bounded by nominally flat surfaces. Int J Solids Struct. 2024;302:112979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijso....
 
18.
Asmani M, Kermel C, Leriche A, Ourak M. Influence of porosity on Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio in alumina ceramics. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2001;21(8):1081–1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-....
 
19.
Kováčik J. Correlation between Young's modulus and porosity in porous materials. J Mater Sci Lett. 1999;18(13):1007–1010. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006....
 
20.
Lam DC, Lange FF, Evans AG. Mechanical properties of partially dense alumina produced from powder compacts. J Am Cer Soc. 1994;77(8):2113–2117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151....
 
21.
Altenbach H. An alternative determination of transverse shear stiff-nesses for sandwich and laminated plates. Int J Solids Struct. 2000;37(25):3503–3520. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-....
 
22.
Jankowski P. On the nonlocal interaction range for stability of nanobe-ams with nonlinear distribution of material properties. Acta Mech Au-tom. 2022;16(2): 151-161. https://doi.org/10.2478/ama-20....
 
23.
Bîrsan M, Sadowski T, Marsavina L, Linul E, Pietras D. Mechanical behavior of sandwich composite beams made of foams and functionally graded materials. Int J Solids Struct. 2013;50(3-4):519–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijso....
 
24.
Nahirnyj T, Tchervinka K. Near-surface mass defect in models of locally heterogeneous solid mechanics. Acta Mech Autom. 2019;13(3):205-210. https://doi.org/10.2478/ama-20....
 
25.
Gibson LJ, Ashby MF. Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties. Cam-bridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978 1139878326.
 
26.
Niyogi S, Gupta BS. Mechanical properties and pore size distribution in athermal shear-strained porous glasses. arXiv [Preprint] arXiv:2106.03473. 2021. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv....
 
27.
Altenbach H, Bruno G, Eremeyev VA, Gutkin MY, Müller WH, editors. Mechanics of Heterogeneous Materials. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
 
eISSN:2300-5319
ISSN:1898-4088
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top