RESEARCH PAPER
Numerical Study of Vortex Dynamics and Power Consumption in RushtoStirred Tanks with Vertical, Square, and Triangular Baffle
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Hassiba Benbouali University of Chlef, Algeria
2
Common Core Department in Technology, Hassiba Benbouali University of Chlef, Algeria
3
Department of Marine Engineering, University of Sciences and Technology Mohamed-Boudiaf, Algeria
4
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National School of Engineers of Sfax, Tunisia
These authors had equal contribution to this work
Submission date: 2025-12-14
Final revision date: 2026-02-16
Acceptance date: 2026-02-18
Publication date: 2026-06-25
Corresponding author
Youcef KAMLA
Common Core Department in Technology, Hassiba Benbouali University of Chlef, Hay Salem, route nationale N° 19 02000 Chlef, Algé, 20000, route nationale N° 19 02000 Chlef, Algérie, Algeria
Acta Mechanica et Automatica 2026;20(2):473-481
HIGHLIGHTS
- CFD analysis of Rushton turbine with vertical, square, and triangular baffles
- Square baffles reduce power consumption by up to 30% compared to vertical baffles
- MRF-based turbulent simulations performed for Reynolds numbers up to 10⁵
- Vortex structures and power consumption strongly depend on baffle geometry
- Optimal baffle width ratio (E/D = 9/40) minimizes power consumption
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The present study numerically investigates the influence of different baffle types in a vessel stirred by a Rushton turbine. Three configurations were examined: a Rushton turbine combined with vertical baffles (VBR), square baffles (SBR), and triangular baffles (TBR). Turbulent flow simulations were performed for Reynolds numbers ranging from 4×10⁴ to 10⁵ using the Multiple Reference Frame (MRF) approach implemented in the CFD software CFX 18.0. The vortex structure and power consumption were analyzed for each geometrical configuration. The results show that square baffles offer the best performance, with a reduction in power consumption of 2.85% compared to the triangular baffles (TBR) and 30% relative to the vertical baffles (VBR). Furthermore, for the SBR configuration, variations in baffle width (E/D) and baffle height (F/D) (tested at F/D = 9/40, 1/4, 4/15, and 3/10) indicate that tanks equipped with baffles having a ratio of E/D = 9/40 exhibit lower power consumption compared to the other configurations.
REFERENCES (30)
1.
Torotwa I, Ji C. A study of the mixing performance of different impeller designs in stirred vessels using computational fluid dynamics. Designs. 2018;2(1):10.
https://doi.org/10.3390/design....
2.
Kamla Y, Bouzit M, Ameur H, Arab MI, Hadjeb A. Effect of the inclina-tion of baffles on the power consumption and fluid flows in a vessel stirred by a Rushton turbine. Chin J Mech Eng. 2017;30(4):1008–1016.
https://doi.org/10.1007/S10033....
3.
Iranshahi A, Devals C, Heniche M, Fradette L, Tanguy PA, Takenaka K. Hydrodynamics characterization of the Maxblend impeller. Chem Eng Sci. 2007;62(14):3641–3653.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.....
4.
Kumaresan T, Joshi JB. Effect of impeller design on the flow pattern and mixing in stirred tanks. Chem Eng J. 2006;115(3):173–193.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.....
5.
Chtourou W, Ammar M, Driss Z, Abid MS. CFD prediction of the turbulent flow generated in stirred square tank by a Rushton turbine. Energy Power Eng. 2014;6:95–110.
https://doi.org/10.4236/epe.20....
6.
Hadjeb A, Bouzit M, Kamla Y, Ameur H. A new geometrical model for mixing of highly viscous fluids by combining two-blade and helical screw agitators. Pol J Chem Technol. 2017;19(3):83–91.
https://doi.org/10.1515/pjct-2....
7.
Ameur H. Some modifications in the Scaba 6SRGT impeller to en-hance the mixing characteristics of Herschel–Bulkley fluids. Food Bi-oprod Process. 2019;117:302–309.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.....
9.
Hasmadi M, Aini IN, Mamot S, Yusof MSA. The effect of different types of stirrer and fractionation temperatures on the yield, characteris-tics and quality of oleins. J Food Lipids. 2002;9(4):295–307.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745....
10.
De Lathouder KM, Fló TM, Kapteijn F, Moulijn JA. A novel structured bioreactor: Development of a monolithic stirrer reactor with immobilized lipase. Catal Today. 2005;105(3–4):443–447.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catt....
11.
Alvarez MM, Zalc JM, Shinbrot T, Arratia PE, Muzzio FJ. Mechanisms of mixing and creation of structure in laminar stirred tanks. AIChE J. 2002;48(10):2135–2148.
https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.69....
12.
Nere NK, Patwardhan AW, Joshi JB. Liquid-phase mixing in stirred vessels: turbulent flow regime. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2003;42(12):2661–2698.
https://doi.org/10.1021/ie0206....
13.
Salho AK, Hamzah DA. A review of stirred tank dynamics: power consumption, mixing time and impeller geometry. Int J Heat Technol. 2024;42(3):1081–1092.
https://doi.org/10.18280/ijht.....
14.
Brahim S, Bouzit M, Mokhefi A, Youcefi S. Hydrodynamic and energet-ic investigations of laminar flow of a non-Newtonian fluid in a tank equipped with a zigzag-bladed anchor impeller. J Food Process Eng. 2025;48(5).
https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.7....
15.
Chachi M, Kamla Y, Alhaffar MT, et al. Quantitative assessment of agitator performance in an anchor-stirred tank. Arab J Sci Eng. 2024;49:13885–13895.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369....
16.
Foukrach M, Bouzit M, Ameur H, Kamla Y. Effect of agitator’s types on the hydrodynamic flow in an agitated tank. Chin J Mech Eng. 2020;33:1–18.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s10033....
17.
Gu D, Xu H, Ye M, Wen L. Design of impeller blades for intensification of fluid mixing in a stirred tank. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2022;138:104475.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtic....
18.
Hoseini SS, Najafi G, Ghobadian B, Akbarzadeh AH. Impeller shape-optimization of stirred-tank reactor. Chem Eng J. 2021;413:127497.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.....
19.
Jo HJ, Jang HK, Kim YJ, Hwang WR. Analyses of dynamical systems structures and mixing patterns in an anchor agitator. J Chem Eng Jpn. 2018;51:135–142.
https://doi.org/10.1252/jcej.1....
20.
Brucato A, Ciofalo M, Grisafi F, Micale G. Numerical prediction of flow fields in baffled stirred vessels. Chem Eng Sci. 1998;53(21):3653–3684.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-....
21.
Bartels C, Breuer M, Wechsler K, Durst F. CFD applications on parallel computers: stirred vessel flows. Comput Fluids. 2002;31(1):69–97.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-....
22.
Foukrach M, Ameur H. Effect of baffles shape on flow patterns and power consumption in stirred vessels. SN Appl Sci. 2019;1(11):1503.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452....
23.
Lu WM, Wu HZ, Ju MY. Effects of baffle design on liquid mixing in an aerated stirred tank. Chem Eng Sci. 1997;52(21–22):3843–3851.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-....
25.
Shen Y, Qin B, Li X, Zhu Z, Cui P, Gao J, Wang Y. Flow characteris-tics of liquid–liquid mixing with V-shaped baffles. Environ Dev Sustain. 2020;1–16.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668....
26.
Major-Godlewska M, Karcz J. Power consumption in vessels with pitched blade turbines and short baffles. Chem Pap. 2018;72(5):1081–1088.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696....
27.
Youcefi S, Bouzit M, Ameur H, Kamla Y, Youcefi A. Effect of design parameters on flow fields and power in tanks stirred by Rushton turbine. Chem Process Eng. 2013;34(2):293–307.
https://doi.org/10.2478/cpe-20....
29.
Wu H, Patterson GK. Laser-Doppler measurements of turbulent-flow parameters in a stirred mixer. Chem Eng Sci. 1989;44(10):2207–2221.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2....
30.
Falkovich G. Fluid Mechanics: A Short Course for Physicists. Cam-bridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.