RESEARCH PAPER
Investigation on Vibration Behaviour and Damping Enhancement of Single-Stage Cantilever Beam Employing Copper Tuned Mass Dampers
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Civil Engineering, Government Engineering College, India
 
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Government Engineering College, India
 
3
Department of Civil Engineering, Government SKSJ Technological Institute, India
 
4
Department of Mechatronics, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, India
 
These authors had equal contribution to this work
 
 
Submission date: 2025-11-27
 
 
Final revision date: 2026-03-25
 
 
Acceptance date: 2026-03-31
 
 
Publication date: 2026-06-05
 
 
Corresponding author
Vikas Singh PANWAR   

Department of Mechatronics, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, Manipal, India
 
 
Acta Mechanica et Automatica 2026;20(2):291-297
 
HIGHLIGHTS
  • Experimental analysis of free and forced vibrations in cantilever structures
  • Natural frequencies identified using log decrement and modal shaker excitation
  • Copper beam inclusion reduced natural frequency, acting as an effective TMD
  • Consistent results validated the accuracy of the DEWESOFTX-based test setup
  • Vibration amplitude significantly reduced, improving structural stability
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
An experimental study of a single-stage structure subjected to forced and free vibrations is presented in this article. The primary goals of the investigation are to identify the natural frequencies and analyse their dynamic behaviour. Homogeneous cantilever beams and their variations are tested using the DEWESOFTX software, both with and without a copper beam condition. An examination of free vibration was done. The structures were mounted on a modal shaker for forced vibration analysis, and the frequency response under forward sweep excitation was examined. The natural frequency was determined to be 7.324 Hz in the forced vibration scenario and 8.54 Hz in the free vibration case for the single-stage structure without a copper beam, showing good agreement. The natural frequency dropped to 7.42 Hz for free vibration and 7.32 Hz for forced vibration when a copper beam was added, indicating its potential as a tuned mass damper (TMD) to successfully lessen the vibrations. The structure's amplitude has been successfully decreased, and its stability and performance have been improved by using a copper beam as a vibration-damping medium. Analysing the vibration and damping properties of copper as a tuned mass damper is the aim of this study. Finding a single-stage structure's natural frequency under forced and free vibration settings with and without copper beam as a TMD is the main goal of this work.
REFERENCES (40)
1.
Liu J, Yao J, Huang K, Ze L. Analysis of a nonlinear tuned mass damper using the multi-scale method. J. Theor. Appl. Mech. Poland; 2022.
 
2.
Wu C. Discrete Distributed Tuned Mass Damper. Cham. Switzerland: Springer; 2021.
 
3.
Mayou A, Denoel V. The retuner: A low-energy and slow-timescale control device for the re-tuning of a suboptimal tuned mass damper. J. Sound Vib; 2024.
 
4.
Voica TF, Stratan A. Controlling drift demands in steel moment resisting frames at frequent earthquakes using tuned mass dampers in Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering; 2022.
 
5.
Pozos-Estrada A, Garcia-Soto AD, Gomez R, Escobar JA. Use of TMDs to mitigate the vibration of a curved steel bridge. Proc. 8th Int. Conf. Structural Dynamics (EURODYN); 2011.
 
6.
Nawrotzki P. Tuned-mass systems for the dynamic upgrade of buildings and other structures. Proc. EASEC-11: 11th East Asia-Pacific Conf. Structural Engineering and Construction; 2008.
 
7.
Magdaleno A, Lorenzana A. A transmissibility-based procedure to estimate the modal properties of an on-board tuned mass damper. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2020; 140.
 
8.
Picauly F, Priyosulistyo H, Suhendro B, Triwiyono A. Influence of vibration of human activity upon a simple supported slab with tuned mass damper (TMD) and fiber reinforced rubber (FRR) absorber. Procedia Eng. 2017; 171: 1098–1105.
 
9.
Lu J, He L, Hu P, Wang C. Experimental study of vibration reduction in a wide-frequency-band pipeline using a tuned mass damper. J. Beijing Univ. Chem. Technol. (Nat. Sci. Ed.). 2015; 42 (2): 59–65.
 
10.
Miniero L, Mensah GA, Bourquard C, Noiray N. Failure of thermoacoustic instability control due to periodic hot gas ingestion in Helmholtz dampers. J. Sound Vib. 2023;. 548: 117544. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jsv.2022.117544.
 
11.
Tian H, Soltani MN, Nielsen ME. Review of floating wind turbine damping technology. Ocean Eng. 2023; 278: 114365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocea....
 
12.
Gao P, Yu T, Zhang Y, Wang J, Zhai J. Vibration analysis and control technologies of hydraulic pipeline system in aircraft: A review. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 2021; 34(4):83–114.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.....
 
13.
Beijen MA, Hakvoort WBJ. Filtered-error recursive least squares optimization for disturbance feedforward control in active vibration isolation. IFAC-Papers Online. 2019; 52 (15): 448–453.
 
14.
Gwalani P, Jaiswal OR. Vibration control using tuned mass damper. Proc. Int. Conf. Emerging Technology in Structural Engineering (ETSE-2017). Mar. 2017.
 
15.
Yang W, Zhang H, Chen Z, Hua X, Niu H, Li S. Enhanced performance of CuFe alloy eddy-current damping and its advantages in multi-mode vibration control of stay-cable. Eng. Struct. 2024; 299: 117102.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engs....
 
16.
Sodano HA et al. Non-contact vibration control system employing an active eddy current damper. J. Sound Vib. 2007; 304: 361–379, 2007.
 
17.
Yan B et al. A novel lever-type vibration isolator with eddy current damping. J. Sound Vib. 2021; 494: 115856.
 
18.
Sodano HA et al. Concept and model of eddy current damper for vibration suppression of a beam. J. Sound Vib. 2005; 288: 1177–1195.
 
19.
Abbas SF et al. Effect of grain size on electrical conductivity of copper–iron alloys. J. Alloys Compd. 2017; 695: 226–233.
 
20.
Weng GJ. Some elastic properties of reinforced solids containing spherical inclusions. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 1984; 22 (7): 845–856.
 
21.
Vickery BJ et al. Simplified approaches to the evaluation of the across-wind response of chimneys. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 1983; 13: 371–386.
 
22.
Liu S, Lu Z, Li P, Ding S, Wan F. Shaking table test and numerical simulation of eddy-current tuned mass damper for structural seismic control considering soil–structure interaction. Eng. Struct. 2020; 212: 110531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engs....
 
23.
Huang H, Mosalam KM, Chang W-S. Adaptive tuned mass damper with shape memory alloy for seismic application. Eng. Struct. 2020; 223: 111171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engs....
 
24.
Patil VS et al. A study of sound pressure level inside a truck cabin for new acoustic materials: An experimental and FEA approach. Alexandria Eng. J. 2021; 60: 1397–1412, 2021. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.aej.2021.03.074.
 
25.
Swamy V et al. Investigation of mechanical properties of natural material 3D-printed specimens. Mater. Res. Forum; 2025.
 
26.
Patil VS et al. Enhancing material properties with a sustainable wood–quartz–HDPE composite: A study on strength. Cogent Eng. 2024; 11. https://doi.org/10.1080/233119....
 
27.
Bae J-S et al. Vibration suppression of a cantilever beam using a magnetically tuned mass damper. J. Sound Vib. 2012; 331(26): 5669–5684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.....
 
28.
Akbar MA, Wong WW, Rustighi E. Design optimization of a single-mass impact damper. J. Sound Vib. 2024; 570: 118019.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.....
 
29.
Yang F, Sedaghati R, Esmailzadeh E. Vibration suppression of structures using tuned mass damper technology: A state-of-the-art review. J. Vib. Acoust. 2020;28: 7–8.https://doi.org/10.1177/107754....
 
30.
Lu Z, Huang B, Zhang Q, Lu X. Experimental and analytical study on vibration control effects of eddy-current tuned mass dampers under seismic excitations. J. Sound Vib. 2018; 421: 153–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.....
 
31.
Larose GL et al. Modelling of tuned mass dampers for wind-tunnel tests on a full-bridge aeroelastic model. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 1995; 57: 187–200.
 
32.
Bae J-S et al. Vibration suppression of a cantilever beam using magnetically tuned mass damper. J. Sound Vib. 2012; 331: 5669–5684.
 
33.
Tamura Y et al. Effectiveness of tuned liquid dampers under wind excitation. Eng. Struct. 1995; 17 ( 9): 609–621.
 
34.
Yao JTP. Concept of structural control. J. Struct. Div. ASCE. 1972; 98 (ST7): 1567–1574.
 
35.
Casciati F, Faravelli L, Vece A. A passive control device with SMA components: From the prototype to the model. Struct. Control Health Monit. 2009; 16 (7–8): 650–664.
 
36.
Colherinhas GB, Shzu MAM, Avila SM, de Morais MVG. Wind Tower Vibration Controlled by a Pendulum TMD using Genetic Optimization: Beam Modelling. Procedia Engineering. 2017; 199: 1623-1628.
 
37.
Chu W, Wang YQ. A novel strategy for vibration suppression of thin-walled structures: Beams and plates. Thin-Walled Structures. 2026; 218 (Part C): 114-143.
 
38.
Ozuygur AR, Elias S. Seismic fragility assessment of structures with friction pendulum isolators, tuned mass dampers and hybrid control systems. Structures. 2025; 82.
 
39.
LiaoM, Yongqing Yang Y , Li Z, Zhao C, Huang S, Huang X, Xie M. Vibration analysis and comfort assessment of large cantilevered sidewalks on a spatial x-shaped tie arch bridge considering human–vehicle–structure interactions. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering. 2026; 30(2).
 
40.
Abbas Q, Nawaz R, Yaqoob H, Ali HM, Jamil MM. Nonlinear vibration analysis of cantilever beams: Analytical, numerical and experimental perspectives. Partial Differential Equations in Applied Mathematics. 2025; 13.
 
eISSN:2300-5319
ISSN:1898-4088
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top